#1005368 xserver-xorg-core: Won’t upgrade

Package:
xserver-xorg-core
Source:
xorg-server
Description:
Xorg X server - core server
Submitter:
Nicolas Patrois
Date:
2023-04-05 01:30:03 UTC
Severity:
normal
#1005368#5
Date:
2022-02-12 08:14:19 UTC
From:
To:
Dear Maintainer,

The package won’t upgrade because it needs to remove driver packages (nearly
every driver packages), including the driver that I’m currently using.
Here is the list of the packages that won’t upgrade:
xserver-xorg-core xserver-xorg-input-libinput xserver-xorg-video-amdgpu
xserver-xorg-video-ati xserver-xorg-video-dummy xserver-xorg-video-fbdev
xserver-xorg-video-intel xserver-xorg-video-qxl xserver-xorg-video-radeon
xserver-xorg-video-vesa xserver-xorg-video-vmware

Yours,
n.

#1005368#10
Date:
2023-04-04 16:50:15 UTC
From:
To:
Are you still unable to install xserver-xorg-core without having to
remove all your drivers packages?

Mind you were on unstable and unstable is supposed to have upgrade path
breakages from time to time. Have you waited a few days to confirm the
issue was not a transistion in progress?

Can you close the issue if the issue is gone now?

Cheers,
Alban
(nearly
using.
amdgpu
fbdev
radeon
/usr/lib/mesa-diverted/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libGL.so.1.2.0 by glx-
diversions
/usr/lib/mesa-diverted/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/libGLESv2.so.2 by glx-
diversions
by glx-diversions
/usr/lib/mesa-diverted/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libGLESv2.so.2.0.0 by glx-
diversions
diverted/libGLESv2.so.2 by glx-diversions
diverted/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libGL.so by glx-diversions
/usr/lib/mesa-diverted/i386-linux-gnu/libGLX_indirect.so.0 by glx-
diversions
/usr/lib/mesa-diverted/x86_64-linux-gnu/libGLESv1_CM.so.1.1.0 by glx-
diversions
/usr/lib/mesa-diverted/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libGLESv1_CM.so by glx-
diversions
diverted/i386-linux-gnu/libGLESv2.so.2 by glx-diversions
/usr/lib/mesa-diverted/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libGLESv2.so.2.1.0 by glx-
diversions
/usr/lib/mesa-diverted/i386-linux-gnu/libGLESv2.so.2.1.0 by glx-
diversions
/usr/lib/mesa-diverted/x86_64-linux-gnu/libGLESv2.so.2 by glx-
diversions
/usr/lib/mesa-diverted/x86_64-linux-gnu/libGLX_indirect.so.0 by glx-
diversions
/usr/lib/mesa-diverted/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libGL.so.1.2 by glx-
diversions
/usr/lib/mesa-diverted/x86_64-linux-gnu/libGLESv2.so.2.1.0 by glx-
diversions
/usr/lib/mesa-diverted/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/libGLESv1_CM.so by glx-
diversions
/usr/lib/mesa-diverted/aarch64-linux-gnu/libGLESv1_CM.so.1.1.0 by glx-
diversions
/usr/lib/mesa-diverted/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/libGL.so.1.2.0 by glx-
diversions
diverted/libGLESv1_CM.so.1.1.0 by glx-diversions
/usr/lib/mesa-diverted/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/libGLESv2.so by glx-
diversions
/usr/lib/mesa-diverted/i386-linux-gnu/libGLESv1_CM.so.1 by glx-
diversions
/usr/lib/mesa-diverted/aarch64-linux-gnu/libGL.so.1.2.0 by glx-
diversions
/usr/lib/mesa-diverted/x86_64-linux-gnu/libGLESv1_CM.so by glx-
diversions
/usr/lib/mesa-diverted/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libGLESv1_CM.so.1.2.0 by
glx-diversions
/usr/lib/mesa-diverted/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libGLESv1_CM.so.1.1.0 by
glx-diversions
diverted/libGL.so.1.2.0 by glx-diversions
/usr/lib/mesa-diverted/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/libGLESv1_CM.so.1.1.0 by
glx-diversions
/usr/lib/mesa-diverted/aarch64-linux-gnu/libGLESv1_CM.so.1.2.0 by glx-
diversions
diverted/libGLESv1_CM.so.1.2.0 by glx-diversions
diverted/libGLESv2.so by glx-diversions
diverted/libGL.so.1.2 by glx-diversions
/usr/lib/mesa-diverted/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/libGLESv1_CM.so.1.2.0 by
glx-diversions
/usr/lib/mesa-diverted/i386-linux-gnu/libGLESv1_CM.so.1.1.0 by glx-
diversions

#1005368#15
Date:
2023-04-04 18:05:48 UTC
From:
To:
On 04/04/2023 18:50:15, Alban Browaeys wrote:

Hi

Yes.

You can close the bug now, I upgraded the package (the bug seems to have been solved with no other action).

Yours,
nicolas patrois : pts noir asocial

#1005368#20
Date:
2023-04-05 01:27:02 UTC
From:
To:
This upgrade bug was a temporary unstable package dependency issue
which thus resolved itself with a further upgrade attempt.


Le mardi 04 avril 2023 à 20:05 +0200, nicolas.patrois@gmail.com a
écrit :

I am not confident you mean the bug is fixed or not (when I asked if
you cannot upgrade you told "yes" but then tell that you are able to
upgrade)
Still I concluded that the upgrade path is fine now.