* Package name : python3-sphinx-autosummary-accessors Version : 2022.4.0-1 Upstream Author : Justus Magin <keewis@posteo.de> * URL or Web page : https://github.com/xarray-contrib/sphinx-autosummary-accessors * License : MIT Description : sphinx autosummary extension to pandas or xarray accessors This is a new dependency for building the documentation for dask. One confusing issue is the project is marked as being MIT licensed, but includes the pandas BSD-3 license because some of this project was derived from pandas. Unfortunately there's nothing that says what files were derived from pandas. So my copyright file marks everything as MIT / Expat, but includes the pandas BSD license block though I don't know what to attach it to. I was planning on adding this to the debian python team. Diane Trout
Quoting Diane Trout (2022-06-16 22:32:58) I guess that by "MIT / Expat" you mean that you declared the project as beinge effectively licensed "MIT or Expat". From your description of the situation, the better approach is to instead declare it as licensed "MIT and Expat". - Jonas
https://github.com/xarray-contrib/sphinx-autosummary-accessors/blob/main/LICENSE Which looks like MIT (Expat) https://www.debian.org/legal/licenses/mit In reading the history of how this project came to be they say at https://github.com/xarray-contrib/sphinx-autosummary-accessors sphinx.ext.autosummary is able to create summary and object pages for objects and their methods, but it doesn't work well with accessor styled properties and methods (obj.accessor.attribute). pandas has accessor documentation built using sphinx.ext.autosummary templates, which xarray recently adopted by copying the templates and all related code. To avoid even more duplicated code, and to make it easier for projects to document their custom accessors, this project aims to provide this functionality by way of a sphinx extension. Most of the code was adapted from pandas. Which is why I think the pandas BSD 3 clause license is included. So perhaps it would be best to say MIT and BSD-3-clause. Diane
Quoting Diane Trout (2022-06-17 07:12:58) Sorry for my complete nonsense: I am baffled that I managed to write a full email without noticing that I was talking about same license twice, not two separate licenses. - Jonas
Dear Diane, This package is also needed for new version of dask. I'm interested in having it in the archive so I would like to know what is the status of this package. Do you already have some work done? Is there anything I can do to help? kind regards