I just noticed that the binary package libgdal-perl is no longer provided in Debian testing or unstable. There seems to be no mention in changelog of dropping that package, so I wonder if it was deliberate (and if so I recommend to retroactively add mention of it to changelog. - Jonas -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEn+Ppw2aRpp/1PMaELHwxRsGgASEFAmK+5GcACgkQLHwxRsGg ASEOQw//dgkL8+yASbMWqQ9i4GsiDhPluSMumQuBP9fy5lzlRdhBruoAqkhAtCKK 2SUtj+M3jhgsLMuF9NYFcQKRs58d4vlfGa+VcG8991cvGNkpt77sMq6+I6OZSPg9 IkeJW5A/Oq64Fz6eBFcVOp92242CQ/S1DflJl4yEj0uraSmFzt4O5UzzBbSu5zAS 63XZ6EnLQOnojwvfLJronhidiISdpy7gJpLEyKN2UWypJlyta8kSwt6Gc6KfJIEK 0orVRLMs2fyD5A2rU7xMZ51doPto7cNyeXABmRUy2uKdtNUww9dYfQm+xym+3qdb jcvVoMvwRmx16d/kDcnSG1fhws9wYSWt0z4nRzd7UQ2mqve/sASAHJ7OWN+g8cYx /TNl7uZXE+iuW02k1RBFB/yc6WjoL5gsFx7PsD1c38fdCDUvPvksX3nxeG29m+jC AxaUMU4z2qXDs0fi/591jqBtJ16HzYAg9K0M5nnjLOINEHEuxZ0hazHaG/PYr1Pa hGNsIYaNmloGVtFArJE4CPjPLSHmqNJffY3m3QG6olD0HSrZMiV8B1k9+R0eueX4 rEIGXuT16W+Ke1OlnSqUWltlBomwYzVW1/tcm5aJ4S1mguKUtxanuiBTvecTr3h8 t+bsaTWTq9QiN/deTmTjxuyEs7T12H41FToK2Ja0nmo65/OlCIM= =h4f4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
tags 1014163 wontfix thanks GDAL 3.5 removed the Perl bindings, see: https://gdal.org/development/rfc/rfc84_cmake.html#swig-bindings Searching elsewhere you'll find: https://lists.debian.org/debian-gis/2021/04/msg00004.html " - Perl bindings are deprecated. Removal planned for GDAL 3.5. Use Geo::GDAL::FFI instead " https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/blob/v3.5.0/MIGRATION_GUIDE.TXT#L47 libgdal-perl has no votes in popcon for quite a while, I'm surprised it affects you. If you need Perl bindings for GDAL, consider packaging Geo::GDAL::FFI. Kind Regards, Bas
Quoting Sebastiaan Couwenberg (2022-07-01 14:42:38) It is not that I (strongly) need the library, only that I wonder where it went and whether it was accidental or deliberate. Thanks for sharing the detals of why the Perl bindings was dropped. Please consider adding something like the below to the appropriate changelog entry: * Drop binary package libgdal-perl: abandoned upstream That will help others in similar situation as me, wondering where the package went and looking in packaging changelog for a clue. (yes, it is perfectly fine to edit past changelog entries) Kind regards, - Jonas