- Package:
- src:tinyarray
- Source:
- src:tinyarray
- Submitter:
- Graham Inggs
- Date:
- 2025-04-04 11:45:01 UTC
- Severity:
- normal
- Tags:
Hi Maintainer
Your package FTBFS on i386 during the recent rebuilds for Python 3.10
[1]. I've copied what I hope is the relevant part of the log below.
Regards
Graham
[1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=tinyarray
=================================== FAILURES ===================================
op(a, b))
E AssertionError:
E Arrays are not equal
E
E Mismatched elements: 2 / 3 (66.7%)
E Max absolute difference: 1.11022302e-16
E Max relative difference: 1.11022302e-16
E x: array([nan+nanj, 1. +0.j, 1. +0.j])
E y: array([nan+nanj, 1. +0.j, 1. +0.j])
../../../test_tinyarray.py:375: AssertionError
np_func(a, b))
E AssertionError:
E Arrays are not equal
E
E Mismatched elements: 2 / 3 (66.7%)
E Max absolute difference: 1.11022302e-16
E Max relative difference: 1.11022302e-16
E x: array([nan+nanj, 1. +0.j, 1. +0.j])
E y: array([nan+nanj, 1. +0.j, 1. +0.j])
../../../test_tinyarray.py:396: AssertionError
I've enabled CI/CD on Salsa and the issue is reproduced by the i386 job. See https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/tinyarray/-/pipelines/417235
Also looking at #976514, I wonder whether Architecture: amd64 might be the best available solution. cu Adrian
Wouldn't "architecture-is-64bit" be more reasonable given that it seems to successfully build on other 64bit (though inofficial) architectures? Cheers, Sven