Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): The full build log is available from: http://qa-logs.debian.net/2022/09/17/ecb_2.50+git20170628-1_unstable.log All bugs filed during this archive rebuild are listed at: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20220917;users=lucas@debian.org or: https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=ftbfs-20220917&fusertaguser=lucas@debian.org&allbugs=1&cseverity=1&ctags=1&caffected=1#results A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! If you reassign this bug to another package, please marking it as 'affects'-ing this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.
Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org> ezt írta (időpont: 2022. szept. 18., V, 9:00): ... I think this is an result of native compilation behaviour change in emacs 28 as discussed in this thread for example: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-emacs/2021-01/msg00838.html There are other similar FTBFS bugs and emacs-buttercup has been fixed for example: https://salsa.debian.org/emacsen-team/emacs-buttercup/-/commit/a42603de8c739681d9ae2e660af637ffb583a67d I think the best course of action would be switching ecb to use dh_elpa, but I don't know when I can work on that, thus help is appreciated. Thanks, Balint
Bálint Réczey <balint@balintreczey.hu> ezt írta (időpont: 2022. okt. 24., H, 23:21): There are also changes needed to make ecb compatible with Emacs 29.x, which haven't been accepted upstream, but can probably be cherry-picked: https://github.com/ecb-home/ecb/pull/43