#1028615 tracker.debian.org: tracker.d.o should display results of reproducible rebuilds, not just reproducible CI results

#1028615#5
Date:
2023-01-13 17:49:48 UTC
From:
To:
Dear Maintainer,

since some years, tracker.d.o is thankfully showing results from
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian - which was and is awesome!
However, these are just continious integration test results and
not based on the binaries we publish on ftp.debian.org

But there is a new service, which rebuilds packages and compares the results
against the binaries we publish at ftp.d.o, which is https://rebuild.notset.fr/debian

The data is available in json format here:

- https://rebuild.notset.fr/debian/results/debian_unstable.json
- https://rebuild.notset.fr/debian/results/debian_bookworm.json
- https://rebuild.notset.fr/debian/results/debian_bullseye.json

It would be great, if tracker.d.o could display both kind of results, CI *and*
rebuild results.


Thank you for maintaining tracker.d.o!

#1028615#10
Date:
2023-01-13 23:51:55 UTC
From:
To:
<h01ger> pollo: hmpf, i ment https://rebuild.notset.fr/

thanks, pollo.

#1028615#15
Date:
2023-04-14 18:20:48 UTC
From:
To:
[...]

friendly ping on this. Also if there's anything we can do...!?!

#1028615#20
Date:
2023-04-17 13:05:16 UTC
From:
To:
Hello Holger,

My bandwidth for tracker.debian.org is quite limited and it seems unlikely
that I will tackle this on my own. That said the codebase is rather
sane and it should not be too hard for someone else to implement this...

It has even become much simpler since I implemented the ImportExternalData
mixin that makes it easy to download json and create action items (cf
181db12111b35f9f54e5ed07654d34cff604feb3 as an example).

I would suggest to only import the data from unstable, or at least to
only generate action items for packages in unstable.

Cheers,