Dear Maintainer,
I've extracted the following from a break-down
I've been having for the past three hours (annotated):
-- >8 --
$ seq 90 110 | cat -n
1 90 xx00
2 91
3 92
4 93
5 94
6 95 xx01
7 96
8 97
9 98
10 99
11 100 xx02
12 101
13 102
14 103
15 104
16 105
17 106
18 107
19 108
20 109
21 110
-- >8 --
For the presented input, both of the following constructs are equivalent:
csplit - /10/-5 %10%
csplit - /95/ %10%
And yet:
-- >8 --
$ rm xx*; seq 90 110 | csplit - /10/-5 %10%; head -n9999 xx0*
15
40
==> xx00 <==
90
91
92
93
94
==> xx01 <==
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
$ rm xx*; seq 90 110 | csplit - /95/ %10%; head -n9999 xx0*
15
44
==> xx00 <==
90
91
92
93
94
==> xx01 <==
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
-- >8 --
Additionally to the triviality of this observation,
NetBSD agrees with my assessment.
Best,
наб