#1030751 debuerreotype: diff for NMU version 0.15-1.1

Package:
debuerreotype
Source:
debuerreotype
Submitter:
Adrian Bunk
Date:
2023-02-08 15:24:04 UTC
Severity:
normal
Tags:
#1030751#5
Date:
2023-02-07 09:29:25 UTC
From:
To:
Dear maintainer,

I've prepared an NMU for debuerreotype (versioned as 0.15-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/1. Please feel free to tell me if I should
cancel it.

cu
Adrian
#1030751#10
Date:
2023-02-07 17:15:42 UTC
From:
To:
I'm sorry, but I must admit to being a little bit confused by this --
why was this a whole new bug instead of just a comment on #1022854?

(and why wasn't there any attempt to communicate about why it's urgent
for you before the NMU, especially with such a short delay?  is there
a particular reason you're doing this?  I can guess at your
motivations, but it sure helps if they're written somewhere 😅)

♥,
- Tianon
  4096R / B42F 6819 007F 00F8 8E36  4FD4 036A 9C25 BF35 7DD4
#1030751#15
Date:
2023-02-08 00:59:13 UTC
From:
To:
Given the timezone differences, I've dcut cancel'd the upload for now
(assuming that gets picked up correctly and I didn't mess something
up).

I'm not opposed to the change (or even it being an NMU), but doing so
without a discussion doesn't seem right and I'd like to understand
what the end goal is better and why it's urgent enough for you to
upload with a DELAYED/1 NMU. 🙇

Thanks!

♥,
- Tianon
  4096R / B42F 6819 007F 00F8 8E36  4FD4 036A 9C25 BF35 7DD4
#1030751#20
Date:
2023-02-08 08:02:39 UTC
From:
To:
That was my fault when submitting it, I was not closing the bug
(since it is only workarounded) so "nmudiff" created a new bug.

The urgency is the freeze deadline, I am currently going through
packages that would miss bookworm if they aren't fixed.

cu
Adrian