#1034041 installation-reports: iwlwifi-1000-5.ucode wifi fw not available in installer (wifi & radeon fw missing after boot) #1034041
- Package:
- installation-reports
- Source:
- installation-reports
- Submitter:
- Date:
- 2023-05-23 10:39:02 UTC
- Severity:
- normal
Boot method: win32-loader 0.10.6 Image version: the one for testing as selected by win32-loader dated Apr/01 or Apr/02 Date: 2023-Apr-02 Machine: Acer Aspire 4810TZG (laptop) Partitions: Sys. de fichiers Type blocs de 1K Utilisé Disponible Uti% Monté sur udev devtmpfs 1910140 0 1910140 0% /dev tmpfs tmpfs 390632 1432 389200 1% /run /dev/sda6 ext4 50080296 20482704 27021208 44% / tmpfs tmpfs 1953144 0 1953144 0% /dev/shm tmpfs tmpfs 5120 12 5108 1% /run/lock tmpfs tmpfs 390628 76 390552 1% /run/user/1000 Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot: [O] Detect network card: [O] Configure network: [E] Detect media: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Clock/timezone setup: [O] User/password setup: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Install base system: [O] Install tasks: [O] Install boot loader: [O] Overall install: [O] Comments/Problems: I loaded the installer with win32-loader 0.10.6 from a PC running win7 I selected the testing image. In the installer, it is not possible to use the wifi network to install. The installer doesn't find the firmware for the wifi device. Installing with wired network works. Moreover, after installation, the firmware is not installed for both the wifi card & the video chip. I had to install them manually. Required fw packages were: - firmware-amd-graphics - firmware-iwlwifi I expected these packages to be installed by the installer. See attached logs & lspci output. Please make sure that any installation logs that you think would be useful are attached to this report. (You can find them in the installer system in /var/log/ and later on the installed system under /var/log/installer.) Please compress large files using gzip.
dmesg output (with firmware packages installed) attached
Hi, I had a similar experience with a desktop system containing a Radeon RX470 graphics card. The text-based installation went all right and then even the Gnome desktop opened after reboot, but it ran in a low-resolution mode until I manually installed firmware-amd-graphics (the non-free-firmware archive component was already enabled). Is this the intended behaviour?
Ferenc Wágner <wferi@niif.hu> (2023-05-22): Which installer did you use? Cheers,
Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> writes: Its lsb-release says: DISTRIB_ID=Debian DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Debian GNU/Linux installer" DISTRIB_RELEASE="12 (bookworm) - installer build 20230401" X_INSTALLATION_MEDIUM=netboot so it must have been bookworm RC 1. The date was 22nd of April. I started the kernel+initrd.gz from GRUB.
I must have sent 1/2 a dozen requests to unscript to this email address. debian-boot-request@lists.debian.org <mailto:debian-boot-request@lists.debian.org> This address was in the email headers. Why am I not being removed?
Ferenc Wágner <wferi@niif.hu> (2023-05-22): In other words you were also using netboot. https://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/NetbootFirmware should have details about how to deal with firmware when netbooting. It's been there since ~ forever, and has been updated for Bookworm. Cheers,
Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> writes: Thanks for the pointer. Are you implying that if some firmware isn't loaded during installation, it isn't expected to be present on the installed system either? If so, then it worked for me as intended. (Actually, my Ethernet driver also tries to load some Realtek firmware, but apparenetly works just fine without it, so I only installed it later to reduce warnings from update-initramfs. The graphics firmware was a must for desktop usage, though.)
Ferenc Wágner <wferi@niif.hu> (2023-05-23): I'm implying that installation images produced by debian-cd (and available on cdimage.d.o) should have firmware packages available and ready to deploy, and should do that automatically; while netboot images (produced by the debian-installer build system) don't, and won't be able to deploy firmware packages unless tweaked beforehand via the procedure documented on that page. And yes, I'm seeing similar “wanting while not actually needing” things with some wireless Realtek hardware locally. Cheers,
Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> writes: Yes, that'f perfectly fine. My question was whether the relavant firmware packages should be present on the installed system even if the installer itself did not use/load them. The netboot installer installs everything from the network after all, so it could install firmware packages just as it installs desktop packages for example. Apparently it does not, which is fine again, but I wasn't certain of the intent.