#1034149 unblock: (pre-approval): glib2.0/2.74.6-2

#1034149#5
Date:
2023-04-10 12:17:32 UTC
From:
To:
I've been using this proposed glib2.0 update for a few days and I'd like
to upload it to unstable. There's nothing RC here, but it seems safer and
easier to do several small bugfix updates rather than one large one.

[ Reason ]
Pick up stable-branch changes from upstream, which are expected to be
released in 2.74.7 at some point.

[ Impact ]
If not accepted:
- Peer-to-peer D-Bus servers implemented with GLib, such as the ones in
  gvfs and ibus, won't interoperate properly with sd-bus clients
  (GNOME/glib#2916)
- Some multi-threaded uses of GDBus will have a use-after-free
  (GNOME/glib#2924)
- glib2.0 will FTBFS in non-minimal Docker containers (GNOME/glib#3307)

[ Tests ]
Automated tests continue to pass, and I've been using this version on my
laptop for several days. There is no specific test coverage for the changes.

[ Risks ]
High-visibility key package, but the changes are narrowly targeted.

[ Checklist ]
  [x] all changes are documented in the d/changelog
  [x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
  [x] attach debdiff against the package in testing

unblock glib2.0/2.74.6-2

#1034149#12
Date:
2023-04-10 16:23:06 UTC
From:
To:
Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo

Please go ahead and remove the moreinfo tag once the package is
available in unstable.

Cheers

#1034149#19
Date:
2023-04-11 13:21:25 UTC
From:
To:
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Control: retitle -1 unblock: glib2.0/2.74.6-2

Uploaded and built on all release architectures. There seem to be reports
of autopkgtest regressions, I'm not sure which of those are flaky and which
(if any) are genuine issues.

    smcv

#1034149#28
Date:
2023-04-11 17:39:07 UTC
From:
To:
Hi,

A brief inspection suggests they are all flaky. I rescheduled most of them.

Paul

#1034149#33
Date:
2023-04-12 16:57:55 UTC
From:
To:
Unblocked.