- Package:
- cachefilesd
- Source:
- cachefilesd
- Description:
- support fscache on already mounted filesystem
- Submitter:
- Date:
- 2026-07-18 20:47:01 UTC
- Severity:
- normal
Dear Maintainer(s), cachefilesd has been flagged by Lintian as shipping a sysv-init script without a corresponding systemd unit file. The default init system in Debian is systemd, and so far this worked because a transitional sysv-init-to-unit generator was shipped by systemd. This is in the process of being deprecated and will be removed by the time Trixie ships, so the remaining packages that ship init scripts without systemd units will stop working. There are various advantages to using native units, for example the legacy generator cannot tell the different between a oneshot service and a long running daemon. Also, sanboxing and security features become available for services. For more information, consult the systemd documentation: https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd.unit.html You can find the Lintian warning here: https://lintian.debian.org/sources/cachefilesd In case this is a false positive, please add a Lintian override to silence it and then close this bug. Thanks!
Note that a .service file is attached to: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1053890
Dear Maintainer(s) of affected packages, these bugs have been open for more than 2 years now. Policy was updated to make units mandatory for system services. The removal of compat with sysv-init scripts from systemd has been postponed from trixie to forky, but it is now approaching. In approximately a month's time, this should hit unstable, if everything goes well. Therefore in order to ensure the remaining bugs do not fall through the cracks I am raising severity again, as there is a very high chance the affected packages will stop working as intended in about a month's time in the default setup. As already mentioned in the original bug report, if your package is not intended to work as a systemd service or under systemd at all, please feel free to downgrade or close+wontifx or anything else as you see fit. The severity raising is not intended to make anyone support scenarios they don't wish to support, but simply to ensure attention is given to the issue, even if just to close+wontfix. Also the bugs were opened based on Lintian reports, and it is possible that there might be false positives. Thanks for your work and understanding.
cachefilesd is one of the last packages on my system w/o a systemd service file and systemd-sysv-generator complains loudly. The upstream package does contain a .service file and the attached patch is my naïve attempt to make use of it. A dpkg-buildpackage run appears to complete and the resulting package does include the .service file now, but I don't know the whole dh_ machinery well enough to check if that's sufficient. Please review. Thank you, Christian.