#1053276 polyphone: update d/watch

Package:
polyphone
Source:
polyphone
Description:
cross-platform SoundFont editor
Submitter:
Patrice Duroux
Date:
2023-10-01 18:06:04 UTC
Severity:
normal
#1053276#5
Date:
2023-09-30 16:50:39 UTC
From:
To:
Dear Maintainer,

Here is a suggested patch for this.

Thanks,
Patrice
#1053276#10
Date:
2023-09-30 22:28:01 UTC
From:
To:
Hello Patrice,

for this what? Is there a problem with the watch file,
other than the usual github changed their links one?

I’ve had a fix for the latter in another package of mine
for a long time already but hadn’t had uploaded polyphone
yet. I guess I should probably do that some time. I have
committed the fixed d/watch file now.

Is there anything you still think needs changing?

I don’t like these @magicstring@ thingies very much and
would prefer to not apply them.

Thanks,
//mirabilos
#1053276#13
Date:
2023-09-30 22:28:01 UTC
From:
To:
Hello Patrice,

for this what? Is there a problem with the watch file,
other than the usual github changed their links one?

I’ve had a fix for the latter in another package of mine
for a long time already but hadn’t had uploaded polyphone
yet. I guess I should probably do that some time. I have
committed the fixed d/watch file now.

Is there anything you still think needs changing?

I don’t like these @magicstring@ thingies very much and
would prefer to not apply them.

Thanks,
//mirabilos
#1053276#18
Date:
2023-10-01 16:53:58 UTC
From:
To:
Hi Thorsten,
I just tried to use uscan with the current packaging and faced trouble
with its watch file.
Sure, regarding my patch,do whatever you want moreover if you don't
like using the @@ variables.
Regards,
Patrce

Le dim. 1 oct. 2023 à 00:42, Thorsten Glaser <tg@debian.org> a écrit :
#1053276#23
Date:
2023-10-01 16:53:58 UTC
From:
To:
Hi Thorsten,
I just tried to use uscan with the current packaging and faced trouble
with its watch file.
Sure, regarding my patch,do whatever you want moreover if you don't
like using the @@ variables.
Regards,
Patrce

Le dim. 1 oct. 2023 à 00:42, Thorsten Glaser <tg@debian.org> a écrit :
#1053276#26
Date:
2023-10-01 16:53:58 UTC
From:
To:
Hi Thorsten,
I just tried to use uscan with the current packaging and faced trouble
with its watch file.
Sure, regarding my patch,do whatever you want moreover if you don't
like using the @@ variables.
Regards,
Patrce

Le dim. 1 oct. 2023 à 00:42, Thorsten Glaser <tg@debian.org> a écrit :
#1053276#31
Date:
2023-10-01 17:53:30 UTC
From:
To:
Hi Patrice,

yes, the last upload of polyphone was before the bookworm release,
and just as we had the bookworm freeze, github broke ALL watch
files (by changing their URLs in an incompatible way), so all
packages with watch files on github need new uploads to fix that.

Given that watch files are for the maintainer mostly, that has
low priority usually though.

I suspect you’ll want an upgrade to version 2.3 then… I will
have at it when I find the time (currently dayjob-busy plus
an upcoming concert AND extra vocal training õÕ).

bye,
//mirabilos
#1053276#34
Date:
2023-10-01 17:53:30 UTC
From:
To:
Hi Patrice,

yes, the last upload of polyphone was before the bookworm release,
and just as we had the bookworm freeze, github broke ALL watch
files (by changing their URLs in an incompatible way), so all
packages with watch files on github need new uploads to fix that.

Given that watch files are for the maintainer mostly, that has
low priority usually though.

I suspect you’ll want an upgrade to version 2.3 then… I will
have at it when I find the time (currently dayjob-busy plus
an upcoming concert AND extra vocal training õÕ).

bye,
//mirabilos