#1060069 btrfs-progs: reiserfs support optional?

Package:
btrfs-progs
Source:
btrfs-progs
Description:
Checksumming Copy on Write Filesystem utilities
Submitter:
Daniel Vacek
Date:
2025-08-30 09:31:03 UTC
Severity:
normal
Tags:
#1060069#5
Date:
2024-01-05 15:09:32 UTC
From:
To:
Hello,

I was wondering if the reiserfs support could be split into a separate optional
package.

The reason is I don't really need any riserfs libraries installed on my system
when I never used this FS and I never will.

Have a nice day :-)

#1060069#10
Date:
2024-06-24 23:17:04 UTC
From:
To:
Hi Daniel and Adam,

I think this should be tagged "trixie" because

reiserfsprogs (1:3.6.27-7) unstable; urgency=medium

  * Remove udebs. Acked by Cyril Brulebois and Steve McIntyre on d-boot
    ReiserFS has been deprecated upstream and scheduled for removal
    2025.

#1060069#15
Date:
2024-11-22 13:13:21 UTC
From:
To:
Hi all,

ReiserFS support in Linux has been now removed upstream [0]
So 6.13 won't ship with it.
Though I don't know which kernel ends up in trixie.

This should be discussed now, if we still want btrfs-convert to work
with it.
I don't mind shipping just libreiserfs without mkfs.
ReiserFS isn't year 2038 safe so new filesystems shouldn't be created
anymore.

Regards,
Felix

[0] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=c01f664e4ca210823b7594b50669bbd9b0a3c3b0

#1060069#20
Date:
2024-12-29 05:09:52 UTC
From:
To:
Dear Kernel team, I've CCed you because I'm hoping you know what
upstream support for reiserfs will look like during trixie's life-cycle.

Hi Felix,

Felix Zielcke <fzielcke@z-51.de> writes:

Last I checked 6.12 is next LTS kernel branch, and it's the one that
ptrixie will track.

Is btrfs-convert really the best way for anyone to migrate to btrfs?
From what I can tell the answer to this is still firmly "no", so I'm
actually in favour of dropping it completely.

Are there any other consumers of libreiserfs?

Agreed.  My primary concern is that there will be little no upstream
reiserfs support during the latter stages of trixie's life-cycle.  Why
wouldn't it be best to let bookworm be last release with a libreiserfs
and -progs?  The kernel in trixie seems like it may continue to support
reiserfs, so users could still mount, backup, reformat, restore.

Regards,
Nicholas

#1060069#27
Date:
2025-01-19 17:30:58 UTC
From:
To:
Am Samstag, dem 28.12.2024 um 22:09 -0700 schrieb Nicholas D Steeves:
Hi Nicholas,

I can't find a response from Kernel Team.
But it looks like trixie will ship with 6.12. It's LTS and is the last
Kernel with ReiserFS support.
So I guess it's still possible to mount a reiserfs during trixie's
life-cycle.
reiserfsprogs and btrfs-convert are the only ones.
If it would have been my decision, I wouldn't have added btrfs-convert
support in the first place.
So from my POV I totally agree to remove it.

I'm a bit unsure if we should at least ship with reiserfsck. But if
people still use it >= 2038 then it would do more damage then fixing
your fs.
But I'm totally open to completely RM it.

Regards,
Felix

#1060069#32
Date:
2025-08-30 09:30:52 UTC
From:
To:
Hi Nicholas,

Linux in unstable has dropped now ReiserFS support.
And there's now a bug against reiesrfsprogs to have the unususable
parts removed #1112501 [0]

Do you still want btrfs-convert support with reiserfs or can it be
completely dropped now?

Felix

[0] https://bugs.debian.org/1112501