Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.


Relevant part (hopefully):
The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2024/01/15/python-pbcore_2.1.2+dfsg-5_unstable.log

All bugs filed during this archive rebuild are listed at:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20240115;users=lucas@debian.org
or:
https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=ftbfs-20240115&fusertaguser=lucas@debian.org&allbugs=1&cseverity=1&ctags=1&caffected=1#results

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects

If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.

Control: tags -1 + unreproducible moreinfo

Hi Lucas,

I got information from Andreas Tille that the build failure is
not reproducible in his environment.  Actually I did give it a
go myself, and the build went through for me as well.  The build
log is available on the people's server[1].  Actually, looking
closely, I'm not sure why the build works in normal times: the
build environment does not look to embed python3-pip packages in
both cases, so in my case, pip may not be called in the first
place.

[1]: https://people.debian.org/~emollier/logs/python-pbcore/python-pbcore_amd64-2024-01-18T18:13:24Z.build.xz

Thanks for your quality assessment work, this is very useful to
catch issues!

Have a nice day,  :)

Hi Étienne,

I confirm it builds fine now.

Lucas