I intend to orphan the xf86-input-wacom package since I no longer use Wacom devices. The package description is: This package provides the X.Org driver for Wacom tablet devices. Thanks, Boyuan Yang
Control: owner -1 !
Control: owner -1 !
Hi, I see we are at the current version. I'll keep an eye on the releases from upstream and when we're there I can try to take over maintainership. Will need a sponsor though. Br, Pieter
Hi, I see we are at the current version. I'll keep an eye on the releases from upstream and when we're there I can try to take over maintainership. Will need a sponsor though. Br, Pieter
Hi Boyuan, I looked into the package and I have some questions. 1) I see upstream provides both autotools and meson based builds. Do we have a preference? Is there a documented discussion or decision on what we prefer? 2) Lintian shows missing man pages for two executables. I think I would open an issue upstream for this, asking upstream to provide the manpages and put that issue in debian/README.Debian. I would rather not provide the man pages myself. What do we usually do? 3) debian/patches/1000-appstream-metainfo.patch is not forwarded upstream. Do you mind if I do? Thanks for your response! Pieter
Hi, 在 2026/1/17 4:40, Pieter Lenaerts 写道: It used to use autotools, and I did not alter it (if it ain't broken, don't fix it-style aproach). Switching to meson is of course a choice, as long as work is done to not to lose any functionality. We either keep the status quo, or ask upstream to provide the man page if they are willing to, or write our own man page when they are not willing to. I did not author this patch, so I am not in the position to make comments. Thanks, Boyuan
Hi Petter, You authored debian/patches/1000-appstream-metainfo.patch in xf86-input-wacom. Is it okay for you to forward it upstream? Do you prefer to forward it or shall I do it? Best regards, Pieter
[Pieter Lenaerts] I am perfectly fine with anyone forwarding my patches to upstream.