Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.


Relevant part (hopefully):
The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2024/03/13/opensearch_2.4.1+dfsg-2_unstable.log

All bugs filed during this archive rebuild are listed at:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20240313;users=lucas@debian.org
or:
https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=ftbfs-20240313&fusertaguser=lucas@debian.org&allbugs=1&cseverity=1&ctags=1&caffected=1#results

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects

If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.

control: retitle -1 opensearch: FTBFS with lucene9/9.10.0+dfsg

I have recently updated lucene9. Current FTBFS is caused by missing
lucene9 classes. Thus it seems that lucene9 API has changed breaking
backwards compatibility.

Andrius

Dear Maintainers,

It seems that the sources need compatibility patches[1][2][3], but it
would probably be better to make a new upstream release.

Best Regards,
 Vladimir.

[1] https://github.com/opensearch-project/OpenSearch/pull/11421
[2] https://github.com/opensearch-project/OpenSearch/pull/8272
[3] https://github.com/opensearch-project/OpenSearch/pull/6116