#1069447 gpaw: FTBFS on armhf: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p "3.12 3.11" --test-pytest "--test-args=-v -m ci" returned exit code 13

Package:
src:gpaw
Source:
src:gpaw
Submitter:
Lucas Nussbaum
Date:
2025-08-17 18:11:43 UTC
Severity:
normal
Tags:
#1069447#5
Date:
2024-04-20 13:09:56 UTC
From:
To:
Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on armhf.


Relevant part (hopefully):
The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2024/04/20/gpaw_24.1.0-1_unstable-armhf.log

All bugs filed during this archive rebuild are listed at:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20240420;users=lucas@debian.org
or:
https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=ftbfs-20240420&fusertaguser=lucas@debian.org&allbugs=1&cseverity=1&ctags=1&caffected=1#results

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects

If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.

#1069447#10
Date:
2024-05-13 18:19:25 UTC
From:
To:
Hi Lucas,

[Please CC me on replies, I'm not subscribed to the bug]

Do you have any idea why we don't see the same failure on
reproducible-builds [1]?

Paul

[1]
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/gpaw.html

#1069447#17
Date:
2024-05-16 12:55:11 UTC
From:
To:
Reproducible builds [1] shows a failure on 2024-03-02, but is successful now.


[1] https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/history/armhf/gpaw.html