Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on armhf. Relevant part (hopefully): The full build log is available from: http://qa-logs.debian.net/2024/04/20/bochs_2.8+dfsg-1_unstable-armhf.log All bugs filed during this archive rebuild are listed at: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20240420;users=lucas@debian.org or: https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=ftbfs-20240420&fusertaguser=lucas@debian.org&allbugs=1&cseverity=1&ctags=1&caffected=1#results A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.
Hi Lucas, gcc-i686-linux-gnu is in Build-Depends-Indep, it’s only used to build Arch: all packages. Is there a requirement that these build on armhf? Given that armhf doesn’t have gcc-i686-linux-gnu, I’m not sure how I would go about fixing this, short of asking for the cross-compiler to be added to armhf (which doesn’t seem all that useful). Regards, Stephen
No, indeed. That could be closed, or downgraded to wishlist + wontfix as "arch:all packages can only be built on amd64 due to missing build-depends(-Indep) on other architectures". (I'd prefer a downgrade, because if that bug had existed, I would have seen it and would not have filed the bug) Lucas