#1081675 vboot-utils: The vboot source code contain nonfree software in tests/futility/data. #1081675
- Package:
- vboot-utils
- Source:
- vboot-utils
- Description:
- Chrome OS verified u-boot utilities
- Submitter:
- Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
- Date:
- 2024-11-22 08:27:01 UTC
- Severity:
- normal
- Tags:
Dear Maintainer, The vboot source code has nonfree software in tests/futility/data. If I take bios_link_mp.bin for instance, it's an image meant to be flashed on the boot flash (on the first Chromebook Pixel). So if I do ifdtool -x bios_link_mp.bin it extracts the Management Engine partition which in flashregion_2_intel_me.bin which is not empty: $ ifdtool -x bios_link_mp.bin File bios_link_mp.bin is 8388608 bytes Flash Region 0 (Flash Descriptor): 00000000 - 00000fff Flash Region 1 (BIOS): 00200000 - 007fffff Flash Region 2 (Intel ME): 00001000 - 001fffff Flash Region 3 (GbE): 00fff000 - 00000fff (unused) Flash Region 4 (Platform Data): 00fff000 - 00000fff (unused) The Management Engine firmware is then in flashregion_2_intel_me.bin We can go furthurer with Coreboot source code to verify that it contains nonfree code: $ git clone https://git.review.coreboot.org/p/coreboot.git $ sudo apt install python3-minimal $ python3 coreboot/util/me_cleaner/me_cleaner.py -c flashregion_2_intel_me.bin ME/TXE image detected Found FPT header at 0x10 Found 15 partition(s) Found FTPR header: FTPR partition spans from 0x93000 to 0x108000 ME/TXE firmware version 8.0.20.1513 Public key match: Intel ME, firmware versions 7.x.x.x, 8.x.x.x Checking the FTPR RSA signature... VALID So here we see that the signature is valid, so it contains nonfree code signed by Intel. ifdtool also extracts flashregion_1_bios.bin, and that kind of image should also have nonfree binaries like microcode updates, MRC / FSP binaries, etc inside the "BIOS" partition though I'm unsure how to verify that easily as I'm more used to more recent Coreboot images compatible with cbfstool (here it uses fmap). Though we can at least verify that it contains nonfree microcode quite easily: $ git clone https://review.coreboot.org/p/bios_extract.git $ sudo apt install guix $ guix shell python2 -- python2 ./bios_extract/microcode_extract.py flashregion_1_bios.bin [...] And we then see nonfree microcode: $ ls mcode_upd_0050* mcode_upd_005004F8.bin mcode_upd_005048F8.bin mcode_upd_005090F8.bin mcode_upd_0050D0F8.bin mcode_upd_005028F8.bin mcode_upd_00506CF8.bin mcode_upd_0050A8F8.bin There is more files than just bios_link_mp.bin in this directory, there are even kernel images which lack complete and corresponding source code and that may or may not contain nonfree firmwares. One option here could be to just remove all the files in that directory reguardless of the vboot version. This way if upstream keeps adding more files, they will also not be shipped. Now just removing the tests files might break compilation as the Makefile uses these files, but it might be possible to just disable the tests using files that contain code by patching the Makefile. Also note that I didn't report the bug to upstream (maybe I should have) as they don't have the same policy than Debian. Google may already have the right to redistribute these images (I've no idea what kind of agreement they have with the providers of nonfree software like Intel) as they already redistributed them inside the chromebook themselves, and if they didn't have the right to redistribute them through some other means, they might not have added it in the first place in their source code repository. Though it's also possible that it's also a bug upstream but we have no way to know without bugreporting first. I also started bugreporting that bug inside other distributions like Trisquel which is a downstream of Debian. Since these utilities are widespread maybe we need to coordinate with all the distributions that have policies that require not to ship nonfree software in certain repositories. Guix is also affected (I didn't bugreport yet), Fedora might be affected as well, etc. I'm also not sure if other distros that don't have rules like the DFSG, FSDG, etc would be interested or not as I'm unsure if they have the right to redistribute these binaries or not (it might depend on the jurisdiction they operate in) or if they would even care.
Hi, I've also contacted Coreboot and at some point someone on their mailing list took care of forwarding the bug to Google: https://mail.coreboot.org/hyperkitty/list/coreboot@coreboot.org/thread/6JI7KTJ3QVK6Q5BLNWREX2IBVZP7GCLP/ So it might get fixed upstream at some point but it will probably take some time before that happens because firmware images need to be re-made without the nonfree software and signed with different keys. Denis.
Hello, Bug #1081675 in vboot-utils reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/vboot-utils/-/commit/7c8511267b675c82d08c57225da4975094c65f9c (this message was generated automatically) -- Greetings https://bugs.debian.org/1081675
I am going to upload a NMU later to fix this. The changes are in git and also attached as a debdiff.
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of vboot-utils, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 1081675@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org> (supplier of updated vboot-utils package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org) Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2024 13:20:44 +0100 Source: vboot-utils Architecture: source Version: 0~R106-15054.B+dfsg-0.1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Sophie Brun <sophie@offensive-security.com> Changed-By: Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org> Closes: 1081675 1084077 Changes: vboot-utils (0~R106-15054.B+dfsg-0.1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Non-maintainer upload * Exclude non-free files (Closes: #1081675) * Upgrade to llvm-toolchain 19 (Closes: #1084077) Checksums-Sha1: 167afaec7beb684d526d6e66d4e2d24dbf1fa7b8 2270 vboot-utils_0~R106-15054.B+dfsg-0.1.dsc 281a37412b50d09636fbd9ab860cefe24af57b4e 2447372 vboot-utils_0~R106-15054.B+dfsg.orig.tar.xz 89692738380a3264e7d63f6fbae5bade0e820242 11592 vboot-utils_0~R106-15054.B+dfsg-0.1.debian.tar.xz 1909d7ce902b661cd50ac1b94fa3deb86f4b69eb 6272 vboot-utils_0~R106-15054.B+dfsg-0.1_source.buildinfo Checksums-Sha256: a91d447421762c36f78e8265b73e8a8e6f71a798002883b6a669995280db87f4 2270 vboot-utils_0~R106-15054.B+dfsg-0.1.dsc 5cb02557adb12776fbe8c8ed0f0dee7304d489f0ed80028351f37195158423f0 2447372 vboot-utils_0~R106-15054.B+dfsg.orig.tar.xz 556ee84a01f677b68cf78d7aadf4ade0537f9c2536d3163de3cbd1b54c578bc7 11592 vboot-utils_0~R106-15054.B+dfsg-0.1.debian.tar.xz 39049f1b5ec06b36a248885b96631159bc50ed4f6b9d14c5569cc9d41a343bec 6272 vboot-utils_0~R106-15054.B+dfsg-0.1_source.buildinfo Files: a17a153309258bb9c362f0fbe57f7844 2270 admin optional vboot-utils_0~R106-15054.B+dfsg-0.1.dsc cdd9372e50fd40518a7f958cad690b59 2447372 admin optional vboot-utils_0~R106-15054.B+dfsg.orig.tar.xz ead4fcfb53be18c598d990cce4158bda 11592 admin optional vboot-utils_0~R106-15054.B+dfsg-0.1.debian.tar.xz 7b377b438f25de3d691180d2e3f0bb14 6272 admin optional vboot-utils_0~R106-15054.B+dfsg-0.1_source.buildinfo -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQHEBAEBCgAuFiEEQGIgyLhVKAI3jM5BH1x6i0VWQxQFAmc/TqYQHGJhZ2VAZGVi aWFuLm9yZwAKCRAfXHqLRVZDFAHdDACJHqUaDHcvZWkyJLimqLqFhmRp2Raia3fh DfGWOnAwpvMgIKWNJjwZO+ps17vCg/YHYB1x04L5n6O1idhvmXu6x7ebxF3KnMUR mQ97jDL8yTqDbfXqM14XzqENcl6/OkqN5J0o6En4zIR3MfFGk8KQd7j3Wo0Gz+HX 5B6KcZfTOZfLsO4ciWSxX8V67gJI1WNIWvLKHEO9ufkF7BKJPnnDwLECm9HfD855 NLez6z9nRE1iW2bXscP9XFjYGV4Tgho3rpuwY6buZdeAtu8iEaSrZojzqUypqC0b X83ib9jMGl9cnCjqbxVOkyP2SxtrtsXoEyjJlHepOsSAbFmAiG+QrKzOi8L2tycf ofF8Ke+r9sfHWKesDGrZeGkpvBFqUruOfz355j4UuaaXLwK/Ar294izlkRZfeA03 /ABx+eZ8KSDmPmUubyKi7pfhSsl/V4pMXrfPXe/GXPEKunQAqzvXKHiKtMUTDZSO mE05ppFOrkcZcTz+a6ut5EgpXDw9aqY= =dHzm -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Hello Bastian, Le 21/11/2024 à 14:22, Bastian Germann a écrit : Thanks for the fixes and for the NMU Sophie