#1084885 RFS: golang-github-olareg-olareg/0.1.1-1 [ITP] -- Minimal container registry (program) #1084885
- Package:
- sponsorship-requests
- Source:
- sponsorship-requests
- Submitter:
- MOESSBAUER, Felix
- Date:
- 2024-12-05 17:21:02 UTC
- Severity:
- normal
- Tags:
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "golang-github-olareg- olareg": * Package name : golang-github-olareg-olareg Version : 0.1.1-1 Upstream contact : Brandon Mitchell <git@bmitch.net> * URL : https://github.com/olareg/olareg * License : Apache-2.0 * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-olareg-olareg Section : golang The source builds the following binary packages: golang-github-olareg-olareg-dev - Minimal container registry (library) olareg - Minimal container registry (program) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/golang-github-olareg-olareg/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/golang-github-olareg-olareg/golang-github-olareg-olareg_0.1.1-1.dsc Changes for the initial release: golang-github-olareg-olareg (0.1.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Initial release (Closes: #1084507) Regards,
Felix, Preamble... Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project. The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the review. Review... 1. Build: * pbuilder [1]: Good * sbuild [2]: Good 2. Lintian [3]: Issue Always nice to have a manual page per binary if possible, but not a blocker. W: olareg: no-manual-page [usr/bin/olareg] N: N: Each binary in /usr/bin, /usr/sbin, /bin, /sbin or /usr/games should have N: a manual page N: N: Note that though the man program has the capability to check for several N: program names in the NAMES section, each of these programs should have its N: own manual page (a symbolic link to the appropriate manual page is N: sufficient) because other manual page viewers such as xman or tkman don't N: support this. N: N: If the name of the manual page differs from the binary by case, man may be N: able to find it anyway; however, it is still best practice to match the N: exact capitalization of the executable in the manual page. N: N: If the manual pages are provided by another package on which this package N: depends, Lintian may not be able to determine that manual pages are N: available. In this case, after confirming that all binaries do have manual N: pages after this package and its dependencies are installed, please add a N: Lintian override. N: N: Please refer to Manual pages (Section 12.1) in the Debian Policy Manual N: for details. N: N: Visibility: warning N: Show-Always: no N: Check: documentation/manual N: Renamed from: binary-without-manpage N: N: I: golang-github-olareg-olareg source: duplicate-long-description golang- github-olareg-olareg-dev olareg [debian/control] N: N: The listed binary packages all share the same extended description. N: N: Please add some additional, useful information to the extended N: descriptions that explain what is in each package and how it differs from N: the next. N: N: It is not okay to rely only on package naming conventions to indicate what N: is inside. N: N: Visibility: info N: Show-Always: no N: Check: debian/control/field/description/duplicate 3. Licenses [4]: Good 4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Good 5. Build Twice [sudo pbuilder build --twice <package>.dsc]: Good 6. Reproducible builds [5]: Good 7. Install [No previous installs]: Good 8. Upgrade [Over previous installs if any]: N/A Summary... I believe golang-github-olareg-olareg is not yet ready for sponsorship at this time. Could the contributor rectify one of more of the raised issues. Once updated to your satisfaction and a new upload done, please remove the 'moreinfo' tag on the Request For Sponsorship (RFS) bug report. Regards Phil [1] pbuilder: * Command: sudo pbuilder build <PACKAGE>.dsc * Document: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks [2] sbuild: * Command: sbuild <PACKAGE>.dsc * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article00000002 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild [3] lintian: * Command: lintian -v -i -I -E --pedantic --profile debian (*.dsc, *.changes, *.buildinfo). Each can throw up different results, so be thorough. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/Lintian [4] lrc: * Command: lrc * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReviewTools#licenserecon [5] reprotest * Command: sudo reprotest --vary=-build_path,domain_host.use_sudo=1 --auto- build <PACKAGE>.dsc -- schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article00000004 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Howto#Newer_method
Felix, Preamble... Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project. The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the review. Review... 1. Build: * pbuilder [1]: Good * sbuild [2]: Good 2. Lintian [3]: Issue Always nice to have a manual page per binary if possible, but not a blocker. W: olareg: no-manual-page [usr/bin/olareg] N: N: Each binary in /usr/bin, /usr/sbin, /bin, /sbin or /usr/games should have N: a manual page N: N: Note that though the man program has the capability to check for several N: program names in the NAMES section, each of these programs should have its N: own manual page (a symbolic link to the appropriate manual page is N: sufficient) because other manual page viewers such as xman or tkman don't N: support this. N: N: If the name of the manual page differs from the binary by case, man may be N: able to find it anyway; however, it is still best practice to match the N: exact capitalization of the executable in the manual page. N: N: If the manual pages are provided by another package on which this package N: depends, Lintian may not be able to determine that manual pages are N: available. In this case, after confirming that all binaries do have manual N: pages after this package and its dependencies are installed, please add a N: Lintian override. N: N: Please refer to Manual pages (Section 12.1) in the Debian Policy Manual N: for details. N: N: Visibility: warning N: Show-Always: no N: Check: documentation/manual N: Renamed from: binary-without-manpage N: N: I: golang-github-olareg-olareg source: duplicate-long-description golang- github-olareg-olareg-dev olareg [debian/control] N: N: The listed binary packages all share the same extended description. N: N: Please add some additional, useful information to the extended N: descriptions that explain what is in each package and how it differs from N: the next. N: N: It is not okay to rely only on package naming conventions to indicate what N: is inside. N: N: Visibility: info N: Show-Always: no N: Check: debian/control/field/description/duplicate 3. Licenses [4]: Good 4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Good 5. Build Twice [sudo pbuilder build --twice <package>.dsc]: Good 6. Reproducible builds [5]: Good 7. Install [No previous installs]: Good 8. Upgrade [Over previous installs if any]: N/A Summary... I believe golang-github-olareg-olareg is not yet ready for sponsorship at this time. Could the contributor rectify one of more of the raised issues. Once updated to your satisfaction and a new upload done, please remove the 'moreinfo' tag on the Request For Sponsorship (RFS) bug report. Regards Phil [1] pbuilder: * Command: sudo pbuilder build <PACKAGE>.dsc * Document: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks [2] sbuild: * Command: sbuild <PACKAGE>.dsc * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article00000002 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild [3] lintian: * Command: lintian -v -i -I -E --pedantic --profile debian (*.dsc, *.changes, *.buildinfo). Each can throw up different results, so be thorough. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/Lintian [4] lrc: * Command: lrc * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReviewTools#licenserecon [5] reprotest * Command: sudo reprotest --vary=-build_path,domain_host.use_sudo=1 --auto- build <PACKAGE>.dsc -- schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article00000004 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Howto#Newer_method
Hi Philip, thanks for the review. I fixed all issues (missing manpage and duplicate description) and uploaded a new version to mentors. I kindly ask you to check again. Thanks! Felix
Hi Philip, thanks for the review. I fixed all issues (missing manpage and duplicate description) and uploaded a new version to mentors. I kindly ask you to check again. Thanks! Felix
Hi Philip, thanks for the review. I fixed all issues (missing manpage and duplicate description) and uploaded a new version to mentors. I kindly ask you to check again. Thanks! Felix
Felix, Preamble... Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project. The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the review. Review... 1. Build: * pbuilder [1]: Good * sbuild [2]: Good 2. Lintian [3]: Information, none blocking Running lintian... N: I: golang-github-olareg-olareg-dev: package-contains-documentation-outside- usr-share-doc [usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/olareg/olareg/testdata/.wh.layer2.txt] N: N: This package ships a documentation file outside /usr/share/doc N: Documentation files are normally installed inside /usr/share/doc. N: N: If this file doesn't describe the contents or purpose of the directory it N: is in, please consider moving this file to /usr/share/doc/ or maybe even N: removing it. If this file does describe the contents or purpose of the N: directory it is in, please add a lintian override. N: N: Visibility: info N: Show-Always: no N: Check: documentation N: N: Screen: python/egg/metadata N: Advocates: "Scott Kitterman" <debian@kitterman.com> N: Reason: The folders XXX.dist-info/ and XXX.egg-info/ hold metadata for N: Python modules. Those files are not documentation even though N: some of their names carry the .txt file extension. N: N: Python modules can be both public and private. N: N: Read more in N: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0427/#the-dist-info-directory, N: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0376/#id16, N: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0610/, N: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0639/, N: https://setuptools.pypa.io/en/latest/deprecated/python_eggs.html, N: and Bug#1003913. N: N: I: golang-github-olareg-olareg-dev: package-contains-documentation-outside- usr-share-doc [usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/olareg/olareg/testdata/base- a.txt] N: I: golang-github-olareg-olareg-dev: package-contains-documentation-outside- usr-share-doc [usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/olareg/olareg/testdata/base- b.txt] N: I: golang-github-olareg-olareg-dev: package-contains-documentation-outside- usr-share-doc [usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/olareg/olareg/testdata/layer1.txt] N: I: golang-github-olareg-olareg-dev: package-contains-documentation-outside- usr-share-doc [usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/olareg/olareg/testdata/layer2.txt] N: I: golang-github-olareg-olareg-dev: package-contains-documentation-outside- usr-share-doc [usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/olareg/olareg/testdata/layer3.txt] N: I: olareg: spelling-error-in-binary octects octets [usr/bin/olareg] N: N: Lintian found a spelling error in the given binary. Lintian has a list of N: common misspellings that it looks for. It does not have a dictionary like N: a spelling checker does. N: N: If the string containing the spelling error is translated with the help of N: gettext or a similar tool, please fix the error in the translations as N: well as the English text to avoid making the translations fuzzy. With N: gettext, for example, this means you should also fix the spelling mistake N: in the corresponding msgids in the *.po files. N: N: You can often find the word in the source code by running: N: N: grep -rw <word> <source-tree> N: N: This tag may produce false positives for words that contain non-ASCII N: characters due to limitations in strings. N: N: Visibility: info N: Show-Always: no N: Check: binaries/spelling N: N: I: olareg: spelling-error-in-binary wtH with [usr/bin/olareg] I: Lintian run was successful. 3. Licenses [4]: Good 4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Good 5. Build Twice [sudo pbuilder build --twice <package>.dsc]: Good 6. Reproducible builds [5]: Good 7. Install [No previous installs]: Good 8. Upgrade [Over previous installs if any]: N/A Additional... A. A new package to Debian or a new version upload needs to be '-1'. Could you delete the other changelog entries other than that one and re-ulpoad please. Summary... I believe golang-github-olareg-olareg is ready for review/possible sponsorship. Could a Debian Developer (DD) with available free time, please review this package and upload if you feel it is ready and appropriate for the distribution. Regards Phil [1] pbuilder: * Command: sudo pbuilder build <PACKAGE>.dsc * Document: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks [2] sbuild: * Command: sbuild <PACKAGE>.dsc * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article00000002 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild [3] lintian: * Command: lintian -v -i -I -E --pedantic --profile debian (*.dsc, *.changes, *.buildinfo). Each can throw up different results, so be thorough. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/Lintian [4] lrc: * Command: lrc * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReviewTools#licenserecon [5] reprotest * Command: sudo reprotest --vary=-build_path,domain_host.use_sudo=1 --auto- build <PACKAGE>.dsc -- schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article00000004 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Howto#Newer_method
Felix, Preamble... Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project. The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the review. Review... 1. Build: * pbuilder [1]: Good * sbuild [2]: Good 2. Lintian [3]: Information, none blocking Running lintian... N: I: golang-github-olareg-olareg-dev: package-contains-documentation-outside- usr-share-doc [usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/olareg/olareg/testdata/.wh.layer2.txt] N: N: This package ships a documentation file outside /usr/share/doc N: Documentation files are normally installed inside /usr/share/doc. N: N: If this file doesn't describe the contents or purpose of the directory it N: is in, please consider moving this file to /usr/share/doc/ or maybe even N: removing it. If this file does describe the contents or purpose of the N: directory it is in, please add a lintian override. N: N: Visibility: info N: Show-Always: no N: Check: documentation N: N: Screen: python/egg/metadata N: Advocates: "Scott Kitterman" <debian@kitterman.com> N: Reason: The folders XXX.dist-info/ and XXX.egg-info/ hold metadata for N: Python modules. Those files are not documentation even though N: some of their names carry the .txt file extension. N: N: Python modules can be both public and private. N: N: Read more in N: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0427/#the-dist-info-directory, N: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0376/#id16, N: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0610/, N: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0639/, N: https://setuptools.pypa.io/en/latest/deprecated/python_eggs.html, N: and Bug#1003913. N: N: I: golang-github-olareg-olareg-dev: package-contains-documentation-outside- usr-share-doc [usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/olareg/olareg/testdata/base- a.txt] N: I: golang-github-olareg-olareg-dev: package-contains-documentation-outside- usr-share-doc [usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/olareg/olareg/testdata/base- b.txt] N: I: golang-github-olareg-olareg-dev: package-contains-documentation-outside- usr-share-doc [usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/olareg/olareg/testdata/layer1.txt] N: I: golang-github-olareg-olareg-dev: package-contains-documentation-outside- usr-share-doc [usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/olareg/olareg/testdata/layer2.txt] N: I: golang-github-olareg-olareg-dev: package-contains-documentation-outside- usr-share-doc [usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/olareg/olareg/testdata/layer3.txt] N: I: olareg: spelling-error-in-binary octects octets [usr/bin/olareg] N: N: Lintian found a spelling error in the given binary. Lintian has a list of N: common misspellings that it looks for. It does not have a dictionary like N: a spelling checker does. N: N: If the string containing the spelling error is translated with the help of N: gettext or a similar tool, please fix the error in the translations as N: well as the English text to avoid making the translations fuzzy. With N: gettext, for example, this means you should also fix the spelling mistake N: in the corresponding msgids in the *.po files. N: N: You can often find the word in the source code by running: N: N: grep -rw <word> <source-tree> N: N: This tag may produce false positives for words that contain non-ASCII N: characters due to limitations in strings. N: N: Visibility: info N: Show-Always: no N: Check: binaries/spelling N: N: I: olareg: spelling-error-in-binary wtH with [usr/bin/olareg] I: Lintian run was successful. 3. Licenses [4]: Good 4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Good 5. Build Twice [sudo pbuilder build --twice <package>.dsc]: Good 6. Reproducible builds [5]: Good 7. Install [No previous installs]: Good 8. Upgrade [Over previous installs if any]: N/A Additional... A. A new package to Debian or a new version upload needs to be '-1'. Could you delete the other changelog entries other than that one and re-ulpoad please. Summary... I believe golang-github-olareg-olareg is ready for review/possible sponsorship. Could a Debian Developer (DD) with available free time, please review this package and upload if you feel it is ready and appropriate for the distribution. Regards Phil [1] pbuilder: * Command: sudo pbuilder build <PACKAGE>.dsc * Document: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks [2] sbuild: * Command: sbuild <PACKAGE>.dsc * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article00000002 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild [3] lintian: * Command: lintian -v -i -I -E --pedantic --profile debian (*.dsc, *.changes, *.buildinfo). Each can throw up different results, so be thorough. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/Lintian [4] lrc: * Command: lrc * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReviewTools#licenserecon [5] reprotest * Command: sudo reprotest --vary=-build_path,domain_host.use_sudo=1 --auto- build <PACKAGE>.dsc -- schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article00000004 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Howto#Newer_method
Hi, done! Many thanks. Felix
Hi, done! Many thanks. Felix
Hi, done! Many thanks. Felix
Hi Felix, This package has been confirmed for some time. To move forward I would suggest reading about Go in Debian and then making contact with the Debian Go Team. https://go-team.pages.debian.net/ Regards Phil
Hi Felix, This package has been confirmed for some time. To move forward I would suggest reading about Go in Debian and then making contact with the Debian Go Team. https://go-team.pages.debian.net/ Regards Phil