Dear maintainer(s),
I looked at the results of the autopkgtest of your package because it's
indirectly blocking the perl transition. I noticed that it regularly
fails, at least on ppc64el and riscv64, less so on other architectures
(but all failures I saw were abol_test3).
Because the unstable-to-testing migration software now blocks on
regressions in testing, flaky tests, i.e. tests that flip between
passing and failing without changes to the list of installed packages,
are causing people unrelated to your package to spend time on these
tests.
Don't hesitate to reach out if you need help and some more information
from our infrastructure.
Paul
https://ci.debian.net/packages/s/swi-prolog/
https://ci.debian.net/packages/s/swi-prolog/testing/ppc64el/52722505/
81s Running scripts from table_tests ...DIFFERS: 18 common, 1 extra, 1
missing
81s EXTRA:
81s < remaining(2)
81s MISSING:
81s > remaining(0)
81s ERROR:
/usr/lib/swi-prolog/test/Tests/xsb/table_tests/xsb_test_tables.pl:78:
81s test abol_test3: failed
81s
81s DIFFERS: 18 common, 1 extra, 1 missing
81s EXTRA:
81s < remaining(2)
81s MISSING:
81s > remaining(0)
81s ERROR:
/usr/lib/swi-prolog/test/Tests/xsb/table_tests/xsb_test_tables.pl:79:
81s test abol_test3a: failed
81s
82s ...........................
82s Script
/usr/lib/swi-prolog/test/Tests/xsb/table_tests/xsb_test_tables.pl failed