Submission-Type: new Site: mirrors.ic.unicamp.br Archive-architecture: ALL amd64 arm64 armel armhf hurd-i386 hurd-amd64 i386 mips mips64el mipsel powerpc ppc64el riscv64 s390x Archive-http: /debian/ Archive-rsync: debian/ Maintainer: Julio Avelar and Carlos Melara <charles@debian.org> Country: BR Brazil Location: Unicamp Comment: Julio's email is julio.avelar@students.ic.unicamp.br. He's also maintainer and is available on-site while I do have ssh access. Trace Url: http://mirrors.ic.unicamp.br/debian/project/trace/ Trace Url: http://mirrors.ic.unicamp.br/debian/project/trace/ftp-master.debian.org Trace Url: http://mirrors.ic.unicamp.br/debian/project/trace/mirrors.ic.unicamp.br
Hi, A bit more info since now that I know the form is actually a fronted for BTS. We are also mirroring the CD images (point releases only, not weekly nor daily), but there wasn't "CDImage-* fields" as described in [1] in the forms. We currently don't enable FTP and we have a 1 Gbps connection. Actually it's 10 Gbps, but our network card is only 1 Gbps - at least for now. Cheers, Charles [1] https://www.debian.org/CD/mirroring/#register
Hi, Is there a problem with the submission or should I reach somewhere else? (just a ping) Cheers, Charles
You just need to wait.
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Our automated checks noticed a couple of issues with your setup. Firstly, the trace file at: is dated November 12th, leading our tooling to conclude that your mirror is out of date. Additionally: o We recommend mirrors not sync directly from service aliases such as ftp.<CC>.debian.org (only HTTP is guaranteed to be available at ftp.<CC> sites). Maybe change your config to sync from the site currently backing the ftp.<CC>.debian.org service you sync from? Regards, Adam
Hi, Sorry, I think we messed up when setting the mirror in the first time (on November 12th). I've redone it yesterday and now it seems to be working correctly. That was used on the first setup run and was changed later, but since all updates failed after it never changed. Anyway, everything should be correct now. (hopefully :-) Cheers, Charles