- Package:
- libx11-xcb1
- Source:
- libx11-xcb1
- Description:
- Xlib/XCB interface library
- Submitter:
- Arnaud Rebillout
- Date:
- 2024-12-02 02:57:02 UTC
- Severity:
- normal
- Tags:
Dear Maintainer, The build of the debian-installer images on arm64 fails with: ``` Building dependency tree... libxfixes3-udeb:arm64 Depends on libx11-xcb1:arm64 < none @un H > can't be satisfied! libxft2-udeb:arm64 Depends on libx11-xcb1:arm64 < none @un H > can't be satisfied! libxinerama1-udeb:arm64 Depends on libx11-xcb1:arm64 < none @un H > can't be satisfied! libxkbfile1-udeb:arm64 Depends on libx11-xcb1:arm64 < none @un H > can't be satisfied! libxrandr2-udeb:arm64 Depends on libx11-xcb1:arm64 < none @un H > can't be satisfied! libxrender1-udeb:arm64 Depends on libx11-xcb1:arm64 < none @un H > can't be satisfied! ``` Full logs: https://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/arm64/20241126-01:06/build_cdrom_gtk.log As can be seen at https://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/daily-build-overview.html#arm64, the build started to fail 25 days ago, ie. on the 2nd of November, roughly it corresponds to the upload of libx11 2:1.8.10-1. Best, Arnaud
On Wed, 27 Nov 2024 09:29:44 +0700 Arnaud Rebillout <arnaudr@kali.org> wrote: > > ``` > Building dependency tree... > libxfixes3-udeb:arm64 Depends on libx11-xcb1:arm64 < none @un H > can't be satisfied! > libxft2-udeb:arm64 Depends on libx11-xcb1:arm64 < none @un H > can't be satisfied! > libxinerama1-udeb:arm64 Depends on libx11-xcb1:arm64 < none @un H > can't be satisfied! > libxkbfile1-udeb:arm64 Depends on libx11-xcb1:arm64 < none @un H > can't be satisfied! > libxrandr2-udeb:arm64 Depends on libx11-xcb1:arm64 < none @un H > can't be satisfied! > libxrender1-udeb:arm64 Depends on libx11-xcb1:arm64 < none @un H > can't be satisfied! > ``` I checked the latest builds for libxft2-udeb at https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=xft. We can see that: - amd64: was built against libx11-6 amd64 2:1.8.7-1+b1 - arm64: was built against libx11-6 arm64 2:1.8.10-1 Same with other packages after a quick check. I wonder if the "fix" is just to request a binNMU for all the packages above. What do you think? Arnaud