#1093581 Subject: RFS: sfp-master/1.0.5-1 -- Free software programmer of optical SFP modules for CH341a devices #1093581
- Package:
- sponsorship-requests
- Source:
- sponsorship-requests
- Submitter:
- Михаил Медведев
- Date:
- 2025-06-28 08:55:06 UTC
- Severity:
- normal
- Tags:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sfp-master":
* Package name : sfp-master
Version : 1.0.5-1
Upstream contact : Mikhail Medvedeve-ink-reader@yandex.ru
* URL :https://github.com/bigbigmdm/SFP-Master
* License : LGPL-2.1, GFDL-1.3, GPL-3+
* Vcs :https://github.com/bigbigmdm/SFP-Master/
Section : devel
The source builds the following binary packages:
sfp-master - Free software programmer of optical SFP modules for CH341a devices
To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/sfp-master/
Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command:
dget -xhttps://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sfp-master/sfp-master_1.0.5-1.dsc
Changes for the initial release:
sfp-master (1.0.5-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Initial release
Regards,
Mikhail,
Preamble...
Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to
the Debian project.
This review is offered to help package contributors to Debian mentors improve
their packages (where needed) prior to possible sponsorship into Debian by a
Debian Developer.
Review...
1. Build:
* pbuilder [1]: Good
* sbuild [2]: Good
2. Lintian [3]: Issue
Running lintian...
N:
W: sfp-master: initial-upload-closes-no-bugs [usr/share/doc/sfp-
master/changelog.Debian.gz:1]
N:
N: This package appears to be the first packaging of a new upstream software
N: package (there is only one changelog entry and the Debian revision is 1),
N: but it does not close any bugs. The initial upload of a new package should
N: close the corresponding ITP bug for that package.
N:
N: This warning can be ignored if the package is not intended for Debian or
N: if it is a split of an existing Debian package.
N:
N: Please refer to New packages (Section 5.1) in the Debian Developer's
N: Reference for details.
N:
N: Visibility: warning
N: Show-Always: no
N: Check: debian/changelog
N: Renamed from: new-package-should-close-itp-bug
N:
N:
W: sfp-master source: mismatched-override source-is-missing [other/SFP-
Master.pdf] [debian/source/lintian-overrides:2]
N:
N: The named tag would have been silenced except the context specified with
N: the override did not match.
N:
N: Lintian may now provide a different context for the tag, or something
N: could have changed in a new version of your package. Either way, overrides
N: work best when you require as little context as needed.
N:
N: You can use wildcards, such as * or ? in the context to make a match more
N: likely.
N:
N: Please remove or adjust the override.
N:
N: Visibility: warning
N: Show-Always: yes
N: Check: lintian
N:
N:
I: sfp-master: spelling-error-in-binary programm program [usr/bin/SFP-Master:1]
N:
N: Lintian found a spelling error in the given binary. Lintian has a list of
N: common misspellings that it looks for. It does not have a dictionary like
N: a spelling checker does.
N:
N: If the string containing the spelling error is translated with the help of
N: gettext or a similar tool, please fix the error in the translations as
N: well as the English text to avoid making the translations fuzzy. With
N: gettext, for example, this means you should also fix the spelling mistake
N: in the corresponding msgids in the *.po files.
N:
N: You can often find the word in the source code by running:
N:
N: grep -rw <word> <source-tree>
N:
N: This tag may produce false positives for words that contain non-ASCII
N: characters due to limitations in strings.
N:
N: Visibility: info
N: Show-Always: no
N: Check: binaries/spelling
N:
N:
P: sfp-master source: trailing-whitespace [debian/control:23]
N:
N: This file contains lines with trailing whitespace characters.
N:
N: Whilst often harmless and unsightly, such extra whitespaces can also cause
N: tools to interpret the whitespace characters literally. The tool diff(1)
N: does not like them, either. They are best avoided.
N:
N: Some of these problems can be hard to track down.
N:
N: Whitespace at the end of lines may be removed with the following:
N:
N: $ sed -i -e 's@[[:space:]]*$@@g' debian/control debian/changelog
N:
N: If you use Emacs, you can also use "M-x wh-cl" (whitespace-cleanup).
N:
N: However, if you wish to only remove trailing spaces and leave trailing
N: tabs (eg. for Makefiles), you can use the following code snippet:
N:
N: $ sed -i -e 's@[ ]*$@@g' debian/rules
N:
N: To remove empty lines from the end of a file, you can use:
N:
N: $ sed -i -e :a -e '/^\n*$/{$d;N;};/\n$/ba' debian/rules
N:
N: Visibility: pedantic
N: Show-Always: no
N: Check: debian/trailing-whitespace
N: Renamed from: file-contains-trailing-whitespace
N:
E: Lintian run failed (runtime error)
3. Licenses [4]: Issue
philwyett@ks-tarkin:~/Development/builder/debian/sfp-master-1.0.5$ lrc
en: Versions: recon '3.4' check '3.3.9-1'
Parsing Source Tree ....
Reading d/copyright ....
Missing Files: Paragraph for debian/
Running licensecheck ....
d/copyright | licensecheck
GPL-3+ | GPL-2+ dialogpass.cpp
4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Issue
philwyett@ks-tarkin:~/Development/builder/debian/sfp-master-1.0.5$ uscan --
force-download
uscan warn: In watchfile debian/watch, reading webpage
https://github.com/bigbigmdm/SFP_Master/tags failed: 404 Not Found
5. Build Twice (build source after successful build) [1]: Good
6. Reproducible builds [5]: Good
Note: Test does not block sponsorship and is for information only at this time.
7. Tail of the ratt (architecture dependant packages only) [6]: Good
Note: Test does not block sponsorship and is for information only at this time.
8. Install [No previous installs]: Not performed at this time
9. Upgrade [Over previous installs if any]: N/A
Additional...
Nothing.
Summary...
I believe 'sfp-master' is not yet ready for sponsorship at this time. Could the
contributor rectify one of more of the raised issues.
Once updated to your satisfaction and a new upload done, please remove the
'moreinfo' tag on the Request For Sponsorship (RFS) bug report.
To remove 'moreinfo' tag, add below line to top of email replying to bug report
when a new upload is made.
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
Please try the below on your packages...
[1] pbuilder:
* Command for 1.: sudo pbuilder build <PACKAGE>.dsc
* Command for 5.: sudo pbuilder build --twice <PACKAGE>.dsc
* Document: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto.
* Document: https://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks
[2] sbuild:
* Command: sbuild -d unstable <PACKAGE>.dsc
* Document: https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild
* autopkgtests. See link below.
https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild#Using_qemu_for_autopkgtests
[3] lintian:
* Command: lintian --display-info --verbose --fail-on error --info --pedantic
--show-overrides (*.dsc, *.changes, *.buildinfo). Each can throw up different
results, so be thorough.
* Document: https://wiki.debian.org/Lintian
[4] lrc:
* Command: lrc
* Document: https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReviewTools#licenserecon
Note: Please report false positives as bug reports against 'licenserecon'.
[5] reprotest
* Command: sudo reprotest --vary=-build_path,domain_host.use_sudo=1 --auto-
build <PACKAGE>.dsc -- schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild
* Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article00000004
* Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/
* Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Howto#Newer_method
[6] ratt
* Command: ratt --dist=<YOUR_DISTRIBUTION> <PACKAGE>_<VERSION>-
<DEBIAN_REVISION>_<ARCHITECTURE>.changes
* Document: https://manpages.debian.org/unstable/ratt/ratt.1.en.html
Regards
Phil
Mikhail,
Preamble...
Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to
the Debian project.
This review is offered to help package contributors to Debian mentors improve
their packages (where needed) prior to possible sponsorship into Debian by a
Debian Developer.
Review...
1. Build:
* pbuilder [1]: Good
* sbuild [2]: Good
2. Lintian [3]: Issue
Running lintian...
N:
W: sfp-master: initial-upload-closes-no-bugs [usr/share/doc/sfp-
master/changelog.Debian.gz:1]
N:
N: This package appears to be the first packaging of a new upstream software
N: package (there is only one changelog entry and the Debian revision is 1),
N: but it does not close any bugs. The initial upload of a new package should
N: close the corresponding ITP bug for that package.
N:
N: This warning can be ignored if the package is not intended for Debian or
N: if it is a split of an existing Debian package.
N:
N: Please refer to New packages (Section 5.1) in the Debian Developer's
N: Reference for details.
N:
N: Visibility: warning
N: Show-Always: no
N: Check: debian/changelog
N: Renamed from: new-package-should-close-itp-bug
N:
N:
W: sfp-master source: mismatched-override source-is-missing [other/SFP-
Master.pdf] [debian/source/lintian-overrides:2]
N:
N: The named tag would have been silenced except the context specified with
N: the override did not match.
N:
N: Lintian may now provide a different context for the tag, or something
N: could have changed in a new version of your package. Either way, overrides
N: work best when you require as little context as needed.
N:
N: You can use wildcards, such as * or ? in the context to make a match more
N: likely.
N:
N: Please remove or adjust the override.
N:
N: Visibility: warning
N: Show-Always: yes
N: Check: lintian
N:
N:
I: sfp-master: spelling-error-in-binary programm program [usr/bin/SFP-Master:1]
N:
N: Lintian found a spelling error in the given binary. Lintian has a list of
N: common misspellings that it looks for. It does not have a dictionary like
N: a spelling checker does.
N:
N: If the string containing the spelling error is translated with the help of
N: gettext or a similar tool, please fix the error in the translations as
N: well as the English text to avoid making the translations fuzzy. With
N: gettext, for example, this means you should also fix the spelling mistake
N: in the corresponding msgids in the *.po files.
N:
N: You can often find the word in the source code by running:
N:
N: grep -rw <word> <source-tree>
N:
N: This tag may produce false positives for words that contain non-ASCII
N: characters due to limitations in strings.
N:
N: Visibility: info
N: Show-Always: no
N: Check: binaries/spelling
N:
N:
P: sfp-master source: trailing-whitespace [debian/control:23]
N:
N: This file contains lines with trailing whitespace characters.
N:
N: Whilst often harmless and unsightly, such extra whitespaces can also cause
N: tools to interpret the whitespace characters literally. The tool diff(1)
N: does not like them, either. They are best avoided.
N:
N: Some of these problems can be hard to track down.
N:
N: Whitespace at the end of lines may be removed with the following:
N:
N: $ sed -i -e 's@[[:space:]]*$@@g' debian/control debian/changelog
N:
N: If you use Emacs, you can also use "M-x wh-cl" (whitespace-cleanup).
N:
N: However, if you wish to only remove trailing spaces and leave trailing
N: tabs (eg. for Makefiles), you can use the following code snippet:
N:
N: $ sed -i -e 's@[ ]*$@@g' debian/rules
N:
N: To remove empty lines from the end of a file, you can use:
N:
N: $ sed -i -e :a -e '/^\n*$/{$d;N;};/\n$/ba' debian/rules
N:
N: Visibility: pedantic
N: Show-Always: no
N: Check: debian/trailing-whitespace
N: Renamed from: file-contains-trailing-whitespace
N:
E: Lintian run failed (runtime error)
3. Licenses [4]: Issue
philwyett@ks-tarkin:~/Development/builder/debian/sfp-master-1.0.5$ lrc
en: Versions: recon '3.4' check '3.3.9-1'
Parsing Source Tree ....
Reading d/copyright ....
Missing Files: Paragraph for debian/
Running licensecheck ....
d/copyright | licensecheck
GPL-3+ | GPL-2+ dialogpass.cpp
4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Issue
philwyett@ks-tarkin:~/Development/builder/debian/sfp-master-1.0.5$ uscan --
force-download
uscan warn: In watchfile debian/watch, reading webpage
https://github.com/bigbigmdm/SFP_Master/tags failed: 404 Not Found
5. Build Twice (build source after successful build) [1]: Good
6. Reproducible builds [5]: Good
Note: Test does not block sponsorship and is for information only at this time.
7. Tail of the ratt (architecture dependant packages only) [6]: Good
Note: Test does not block sponsorship and is for information only at this time.
8. Install [No previous installs]: Not performed at this time
9. Upgrade [Over previous installs if any]: N/A
Additional...
Nothing.
Summary...
I believe 'sfp-master' is not yet ready for sponsorship at this time. Could the
contributor rectify one of more of the raised issues.
Once updated to your satisfaction and a new upload done, please remove the
'moreinfo' tag on the Request For Sponsorship (RFS) bug report.
To remove 'moreinfo' tag, add below line to top of email replying to bug report
when a new upload is made.
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
Please try the below on your packages...
[1] pbuilder:
* Command for 1.: sudo pbuilder build <PACKAGE>.dsc
* Command for 5.: sudo pbuilder build --twice <PACKAGE>.dsc
* Document: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto.
* Document: https://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks
[2] sbuild:
* Command: sbuild -d unstable <PACKAGE>.dsc
* Document: https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild
* autopkgtests. See link below.
https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild#Using_qemu_for_autopkgtests
[3] lintian:
* Command: lintian --display-info --verbose --fail-on error --info --pedantic
--show-overrides (*.dsc, *.changes, *.buildinfo). Each can throw up different
results, so be thorough.
* Document: https://wiki.debian.org/Lintian
[4] lrc:
* Command: lrc
* Document: https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReviewTools#licenserecon
Note: Please report false positives as bug reports against 'licenserecon'.
[5] reprotest
* Command: sudo reprotest --vary=-build_path,domain_host.use_sudo=1 --auto-
build <PACKAGE>.dsc -- schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild
* Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article00000004
* Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/
* Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Howto#Newer_method
[6] ratt
* Command: ratt --dist=<YOUR_DISTRIBUTION> <PACKAGE>_<VERSION>-
<DEBIAN_REVISION>_<ARCHITECTURE>.changes
* Document: https://manpages.debian.org/unstable/ratt/ratt.1.en.html
Regards
Phil
Mikhail, Review of upload: 2025-03-04 06:41 For information about the tests run, see: https://wiki.debian.org/PhilWyett/DebianMentoring Test 4 (sbuild): Information only Lintian: Running lintian... N: W: sfp-master: debian-changelog-has-wrong-day-of-week 2025-03-04 was a Tuesday [usr/share/doc/sfp-master/changelog.Debian.gz:1] N: N: The date in the changelog entry is not consistent with the actual day of N: that week. Either the date is wrong or the day of week is wrong. N: N: To avoid problems like this, consider using a tool like dch(1) or date(1) N: to generate the date. Example: N: N: $ date -R -ud '2013-11-05 23:59:59' N: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 23:59:59 +0000 N: N: Visibility: warning N: Show-Always: no N: Check: debian/changelog N: Renamed from: debian-changelog-has-wrong-weekday N: N: W: sfp-master: initial-upload-closes-no-bugs [usr/share/doc/sfp- master/changelog.Debian.gz:1] N: N: This package appears to be the first packaging of a new upstream software N: package (there is only one changelog entry and the Debian revision is 1), N: but it does not close any bugs. The initial upload of a new package should N: close the corresponding ITP bug for that package. N: N: This warning can be ignored if the package is not intended for Debian or N: if it is a split of an existing Debian package. N: N: Please refer to New packages (Section 5.1) in the Debian Developer's N: Reference for details. N: N: Visibility: warning N: Show-Always: no N: Check: debian/changelog N: Renamed from: new-package-should-close-itp-bug N: N: W: sfp-master source: mismatched-override source-is-missing [other/SFP- Master.pdf] [debian/source/lintian-overrides:2] N: N: The named tag would have been silenced except the context specified with N: the override did not match. N: N: Lintian may now provide a different context for the tag, or something N: could have changed in a new version of your package. Either way, overrides N: work best when you require as little context as needed. N: N: You can use wildcards, such as * or ? in the context to make a match more N: likely. N: N: Please remove or adjust the override. N: N: Visibility: warning N: Show-Always: yes N: Check: lintian N: N: I: sfp-master source: out-of-date-standards-version 4.7.0 (released 2024-04-07) (current is 4.7.2) N: N: The source package refers to a Standards-Version older than the one that N: was current at the time the package was created (according to the N: timestamp of the latest debian/changelog entry). Please consider updating N: the package to current Policy and setting this control field N: appropriately. N: N: If the package is already compliant with the current standards, you don't N: have to re-upload the package just to adjust the Standards-Version control N: field. However, please remember to update this field next time you upload N: the package. N: N: See /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/upgrading-checklist.txt.gz in the N: debian-policy package for a summary of changes in newer versions of N: Policy. N: N: Please refer to N: https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/upgrading-checklist.html for N: details. N: N: Visibility: info N: Show-Always: no N: Check: fields/standards-version N: E: Lintian run failed (policy violation) Test 6 (debian/watch): Information only philwyett@ks-tarkin:~/Development/builder/debian/sfp-master-1.0.6$ uscan --dehs <dehs> uscan warn: In watchfile debian/watch, reading webpage https://github.com/bigbigmdm/SFP_Master/tags failed: 404 Not Found <package>sfp-master</package> <warnings>In watchfile debian/watch, reading webpage https://github.com/bigbigmdm/SFP_Master/tags failed: 404 Not Found</warnings> </dehs> Test 7 (licenserecon): Information only philwyett@ks-tarkin:~/Development/builder/debian/sfp-master-1.0.6$ lrc en: Versions: licenserecon '4.2' licensecheck '3.3.9-1' Parsing Source Tree .... Reading d/copyright .... Missing Files: Paragraph for debian/ Running licensecheck .... d/copyright | licensecheck GPL-3+ | GPL-2 and/or GPL-3+ other/sfp-master.spec Summary ======= An up to date review of packages languishing in Debian Mentors. Test 4. You may wish to look at the lintian data above and make appropriate changes. Test 6. 404, oops. Seems the repo has changed from 'SFP_Master' to 'SFP-Master'. Test 7. You may wish to add the highlighted file to 'debian/lrc.config'.
Mikhail, Review of upload: 2025-03-04 06:41 For information about the tests run, see: https://wiki.debian.org/PhilWyett/DebianMentoring Test 4 (sbuild): Information only Lintian: Running lintian... N: W: sfp-master: debian-changelog-has-wrong-day-of-week 2025-03-04 was a Tuesday [usr/share/doc/sfp-master/changelog.Debian.gz:1] N: N: The date in the changelog entry is not consistent with the actual day of N: that week. Either the date is wrong or the day of week is wrong. N: N: To avoid problems like this, consider using a tool like dch(1) or date(1) N: to generate the date. Example: N: N: $ date -R -ud '2013-11-05 23:59:59' N: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 23:59:59 +0000 N: N: Visibility: warning N: Show-Always: no N: Check: debian/changelog N: Renamed from: debian-changelog-has-wrong-weekday N: N: W: sfp-master: initial-upload-closes-no-bugs [usr/share/doc/sfp- master/changelog.Debian.gz:1] N: N: This package appears to be the first packaging of a new upstream software N: package (there is only one changelog entry and the Debian revision is 1), N: but it does not close any bugs. The initial upload of a new package should N: close the corresponding ITP bug for that package. N: N: This warning can be ignored if the package is not intended for Debian or N: if it is a split of an existing Debian package. N: N: Please refer to New packages (Section 5.1) in the Debian Developer's N: Reference for details. N: N: Visibility: warning N: Show-Always: no N: Check: debian/changelog N: Renamed from: new-package-should-close-itp-bug N: N: W: sfp-master source: mismatched-override source-is-missing [other/SFP- Master.pdf] [debian/source/lintian-overrides:2] N: N: The named tag would have been silenced except the context specified with N: the override did not match. N: N: Lintian may now provide a different context for the tag, or something N: could have changed in a new version of your package. Either way, overrides N: work best when you require as little context as needed. N: N: You can use wildcards, such as * or ? in the context to make a match more N: likely. N: N: Please remove or adjust the override. N: N: Visibility: warning N: Show-Always: yes N: Check: lintian N: N: I: sfp-master source: out-of-date-standards-version 4.7.0 (released 2024-04-07) (current is 4.7.2) N: N: The source package refers to a Standards-Version older than the one that N: was current at the time the package was created (according to the N: timestamp of the latest debian/changelog entry). Please consider updating N: the package to current Policy and setting this control field N: appropriately. N: N: If the package is already compliant with the current standards, you don't N: have to re-upload the package just to adjust the Standards-Version control N: field. However, please remember to update this field next time you upload N: the package. N: N: See /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/upgrading-checklist.txt.gz in the N: debian-policy package for a summary of changes in newer versions of N: Policy. N: N: Please refer to N: https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/upgrading-checklist.html for N: details. N: N: Visibility: info N: Show-Always: no N: Check: fields/standards-version N: E: Lintian run failed (policy violation) Test 6 (debian/watch): Information only philwyett@ks-tarkin:~/Development/builder/debian/sfp-master-1.0.6$ uscan --dehs <dehs> uscan warn: In watchfile debian/watch, reading webpage https://github.com/bigbigmdm/SFP_Master/tags failed: 404 Not Found <package>sfp-master</package> <warnings>In watchfile debian/watch, reading webpage https://github.com/bigbigmdm/SFP_Master/tags failed: 404 Not Found</warnings> </dehs> Test 7 (licenserecon): Information only philwyett@ks-tarkin:~/Development/builder/debian/sfp-master-1.0.6$ lrc en: Versions: licenserecon '4.2' licensecheck '3.3.9-1' Parsing Source Tree .... Reading d/copyright .... Missing Files: Paragraph for debian/ Running licensecheck .... d/copyright | licensecheck GPL-3+ | GPL-2 and/or GPL-3+ other/sfp-master.spec Summary ======= An up to date review of packages languishing in Debian Mentors. Test 4. You may wish to look at the lintian data above and make appropriate changes. Test 6. 404, oops. Seems the repo has changed from 'SFP_Master' to 'SFP-Master'. Test 7. You may wish to add the highlighted file to 'debian/lrc.config'.
Mikhail, Being a new package to Debian, this should have an Intent To Package (ITP)[1] bug filed and it be closed as part of the 'debian/changelog'. [1] https://wiki.debian.org/ITP
Mikhail, Being a new package to Debian, this should have an Intent To Package (ITP)[1] bug filed and it be closed as part of the 'debian/changelog'. [1] https://wiki.debian.org/ITP
Thank you, Phil! 20.06.2025 13:39, Phil Wyett пишет:
Mikhail, Review of upload: For information about the tests run, see: https://wiki.debian.org/PhilWyett/DebianMentoring Test 4 (sbuild): Information only Lintian: Running lintian... N: W: sfp-master: debian-changelog-has-wrong-day-of-week 2025-03-04 was a Tuesday [usr/share/doc/sfp-master/changelog.Debian.gz:1] N: N: The date in the changelog entry is not consistent with the actual day of N: that week. Either the date is wrong or the day of week is wrong. N: N: To avoid problems like this, consider using a tool like dch(1) or date(1) N: to generate the date. Example: N: N: $ date -R -ud '2013-11-05 23:59:59' N: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 23:59:59 +0000 N: N: Visibility: warning N: Show-Always: no N: Check: debian/changelog N: Renamed from: debian-changelog-has-wrong-weekday N: N: W: sfp-master source: mismatched-override source-is-missing [other/SFP- Master.pdf] [debian/source/lintian-overrides:2] N: N: The named tag would have been silenced except the context specified with N: the override did not match. N: N: Lintian may now provide a different context for the tag, or something N: could have changed in a new version of your package. Either way, overrides N: work best when you require as little context as needed. N: N: You can use wildcards, such as * or ? in the context to make a match more N: likely. N: N: Please remove or adjust the override. N: N: Visibility: warning N: Show-Always: yes N: Check: lintian N: N: I: sfp-master source: out-of-date-standards-version 4.7.0 (released 2024-04-07) (current is 4.7.2) N: N: The source package refers to a Standards-Version older than the one that N: was current at the time the package was created (according to the N: timestamp of the latest debian/changelog entry). Please consider updating N: the package to current Policy and setting this control field N: appropriately. N: N: If the package is already compliant with the current standards, you don't N: have to re-upload the package just to adjust the Standards-Version control N: field. However, please remember to update this field next time you upload N: the package. N: N: See /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/upgrading-checklist.txt.gz in the N: debian-policy package for a summary of changes in newer versions of N: Policy. N: N: Please refer to N: https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/upgrading-checklist.html for N: details. N: N: Visibility: info N: Show-Always: no N: Check: fields/standards-version N: E: Lintian run failed (policy violation) Test 6 (debian/watch): Information only philwyett@ks-tarkin:~/Development/builder/debian/sfp-master-1.0.6$ uscan --dehs <dehs> uscan warn: In watchfile debian/watch, reading webpage https://github.com/bigbigmdm/SFP_Master/tags failed: 404 Not Found <package>sfp-master</package> <warnings>In watchfile debian/watch, reading webpage https://github.com/bigbigmdm/SFP_Master/tags failed: 404 Not Found</warnings> </dehs> Test 7 (licenserecon): Information only philwyett@ks-tarkin:~/Development/builder/debian/sfp-master-1.0.6$ lrc en: Versions: licenserecon '6.0' licensecheck '3.3.9-1' Parsing Source Tree .... Reading d/copyright .... Missing Files: Paragraph for debian/ Running licensecheck .... d/copyright | licensecheck GPL-3+ | GPL-2 and/or GPL-3+ other/sfp-master.spec Summary ======= Looks good, with a few issues. Test 4. Things have changed since original upload, so a few lintian issues to address. Test 6. Has there been a repo name change possibly? Test 7. The '.spec' file has nothing to with Debian, so you may wish to remove any entry in 'debian/copyright' and then add the file to 'debian/lrc.config' so we can ignore it all together.
Mikhail, Review of upload: For information about the tests run, see: https://wiki.debian.org/PhilWyett/DebianMentoring Test 4 (sbuild): Information only Lintian: Running lintian... N: W: sfp-master: debian-changelog-has-wrong-day-of-week 2025-03-04 was a Tuesday [usr/share/doc/sfp-master/changelog.Debian.gz:1] N: N: The date in the changelog entry is not consistent with the actual day of N: that week. Either the date is wrong or the day of week is wrong. N: N: To avoid problems like this, consider using a tool like dch(1) or date(1) N: to generate the date. Example: N: N: $ date -R -ud '2013-11-05 23:59:59' N: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 23:59:59 +0000 N: N: Visibility: warning N: Show-Always: no N: Check: debian/changelog N: Renamed from: debian-changelog-has-wrong-weekday N: N: W: sfp-master source: mismatched-override source-is-missing [other/SFP- Master.pdf] [debian/source/lintian-overrides:2] N: N: The named tag would have been silenced except the context specified with N: the override did not match. N: N: Lintian may now provide a different context for the tag, or something N: could have changed in a new version of your package. Either way, overrides N: work best when you require as little context as needed. N: N: You can use wildcards, such as * or ? in the context to make a match more N: likely. N: N: Please remove or adjust the override. N: N: Visibility: warning N: Show-Always: yes N: Check: lintian N: N: I: sfp-master source: out-of-date-standards-version 4.7.0 (released 2024-04-07) (current is 4.7.2) N: N: The source package refers to a Standards-Version older than the one that N: was current at the time the package was created (according to the N: timestamp of the latest debian/changelog entry). Please consider updating N: the package to current Policy and setting this control field N: appropriately. N: N: If the package is already compliant with the current standards, you don't N: have to re-upload the package just to adjust the Standards-Version control N: field. However, please remember to update this field next time you upload N: the package. N: N: See /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/upgrading-checklist.txt.gz in the N: debian-policy package for a summary of changes in newer versions of N: Policy. N: N: Please refer to N: https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/upgrading-checklist.html for N: details. N: N: Visibility: info N: Show-Always: no N: Check: fields/standards-version N: E: Lintian run failed (policy violation) Test 6 (debian/watch): Information only philwyett@ks-tarkin:~/Development/builder/debian/sfp-master-1.0.6$ uscan --dehs <dehs> uscan warn: In watchfile debian/watch, reading webpage https://github.com/bigbigmdm/SFP_Master/tags failed: 404 Not Found <package>sfp-master</package> <warnings>In watchfile debian/watch, reading webpage https://github.com/bigbigmdm/SFP_Master/tags failed: 404 Not Found</warnings> </dehs> Test 7 (licenserecon): Information only philwyett@ks-tarkin:~/Development/builder/debian/sfp-master-1.0.6$ lrc en: Versions: licenserecon '6.0' licensecheck '3.3.9-1' Parsing Source Tree .... Reading d/copyright .... Missing Files: Paragraph for debian/ Running licensecheck .... d/copyright | licensecheck GPL-3+ | GPL-2 and/or GPL-3+ other/sfp-master.spec Summary ======= Looks good, with a few issues. Test 4. Things have changed since original upload, so a few lintian issues to address. Test 6. Has there been a repo name change possibly? Test 7. The '.spec' file has nothing to with Debian, so you may wish to remove any entry in 'debian/copyright' and then add the file to 'debian/lrc.config' so we can ignore it all together.
Mikhail, Review of upload: 2025-06-24 11:27 For information about the tests run, see: https://wiki.debian.org/PhilWyett/DebianMentoring Summary ======= Thank you for the prompt update and changes. Looks good here. Tagging as 'confirmed'. I hope a DD can make the time soon to review and possibly sponsor the package for you.
Mikhail, Review of upload: 2025-06-24 11:27 For information about the tests run, see: https://wiki.debian.org/PhilWyett/DebianMentoring Summary ======= Thank you for the prompt update and changes. Looks good here. Tagging as 'confirmed'. I hope a DD can make the time soon to review and possibly sponsor the package for you.