Dear Maintainer,

There is a glitch in the rendering of some hachures in Libreoffice-calc.
I can’t send an attached image because of my provider… but I can send it later.
It’s a basic camembert. The horizontal and vertical hachures are OK, only the
slanted ones are buggy.

Yours,
nicolas

severity 1099106 + moreinfo

thanks


Hi,

Am 28.02.25 um 14:10 schrieb Nicolas Patrois:

What is hachures? Is this french inside an english sentence?

https://translate.google.com/?sl=fr&tl=en&text=hachures&op=translate says you mean "hatching".

You didn't do that yet? A assumed you just wanted to do it anyway? Since as is now, this is not useful at all.

Ideally you should  have waited until you can do that.


And no, no maintainer will have  time to go and report every minor(!) upstream bug upstream and play proxy.

Bugs like this tend to be just ignored due to time constraints.

Report this upstream.


FWIW: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=hatching


Regards,


Rene

severity 1099106 + moreinfo

thanks


Hi,

Am 28.02.25 um 14:10 schrieb Nicolas Patrois:

What is hachures? Is this french inside an english sentence?

https://translate.google.com/?sl=fr&tl=en&text=hachures&op=translate says you mean "hatching".

You didn't do that yet? A assumed you just wanted to do it anyway? Since as is now, this is not useful at all.

Ideally you should  have waited until you can do that.


And no, no maintainer will have  time to go and report every minor(!) upstream bug upstream and play proxy.

Bugs like this tend to be just ignored due to time constraints.

Report this upstream.


FWIW: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=hatching


Regards,


Rene

Oh yes, sorry.
It’s hatching of course.
I thought that "hachure" was also an English word.
Here’s a link:
https://i.ibb.co/RTj8sKc9/libreoffice-calc-hachures-2025-02-28-14-05.png

Sorry, as I use Debian, I send the bug report to Debian, as I always do.

Yours,
nicolas patrois : pts noir asocial

Hi,

Am 05.03.25 um 20:07 schrieb nicolas:
You still haven't given any information on what this is and how this relates to calc..

And there's no sensible way for big packages to play proxy here. Especially for stuff like this which is even so badly reported that there is no actionable way anyway and just lingers around.

If you reported this upstream you coul have told upstream what the problem was (or they knew, I don't.)


Regards,


Rene

On 05/03/2025 23:27:59, Rene Engelhard wrote:

Hi,

Because it’s a chart I built in calc, of course.
If it were in writer, I would have reported the bug against writer.

So, Debian package maintainers are useless? I don’t think so.
Libre office is the only package that rebukes me when I report a bug.

What do you need for such a bug if you want it correctly reported?

Yours,
nicolas patrois : pts noir asocial

Hi,

Am 6. März 2025 06:25:10 MEZ schrieb nicolas <nicolas.patrois@free.fr>:

Aha.

You have no idea how much work it is besides bug reports like this.

You are not making your point better by insulting people who do this in all in free time.

Maybe actually tell how to reproduce this and that is not assuming everyone knows what this chart is and how this is even created

Regards

René

That’s why I ask you what to do.

I’m not insulting you, I’m just trying to report this bug correctly.

OK, let’s go.
Open an empty sheet.
Let A1=15, B1=10, C1=5 and D1=30.
Select these four cells and insert a chart, select « pie chart » then OK.
Double click on one of the part, choose Zone (I don’t know how it’s translated in English, it’s the second tab) then Hatching (or hatches, I don’t know: the last choice).
Choose only black hacthings (the first four ones): the first one for the first part, the second one for the second and so on.
When all four are chosen, see the buggy hatchings that are not parallel and/or that overlap.

I also send an example of a buggy spreadsheet.


nicolas patrois : pts noir asocial

tag 1099106 + unreproducible

thanks


Hi.

Am 06.03.25 um 17:28 schrieb nicolas:

You are.

You care calling people who see no sense in proxying minor bugs to upstream where the submitter best can explain what he needs useless.


I call that insulting.


But anyways:

OK. That should have been in the inital report instead of assuming everyone knows how to get there.

That makes me able to to the steps.

(Though I have only *three* black ones.)

see screenshot (as said I've choosen one of  them two times). (I've noticed later I mistyped the 5 as 1, but even with 5 it shows fine).

Works here.

That one also shows fine. See second screenshot.


This is in a clean sid VM with 4:25.1.2-3.


Regards,


Rene