* What led up to the situation?
Checking for defects with a new version
test-[g|n]roff -mandoc -t -K utf8 -rF0 -rHY=0 -rCHECKSTYLE=10 -ww -z < "man page"
[Use "groff -e ' $' -e '\\~$' <file>" to find obvious trailing spaces.]
["test-groff" is a script in the repository for "groff"; is not shipped]
(local copy and "troff" slightly changed by me).
[The fate of "test-nroff" was decided in groff bug #55941.]
* What was the outcome of this action?
troff:<stdin>:172: warning [page 2, line 21]: cannot break line
troff:<stdin>:250: warning [page 3, line 4]: cannot break line
troff:<stdin>:739: warning [page 6, line 48]: cannot break line
troff:<stdin>:918: warning [page 8, line 3]: cannot break line
troff:<stdin>:1406: warning [page 11, line 55]: cannot break line
an.tmac:<stdin>:1501: style: use of deprecated macro: .PD
an.tmac:<stdin>:1504: style: use of deprecated macro: .PD
an.tmac:<stdin>:1507: style: use of deprecated macro: .PD
an.tmac:<stdin>:1532: style: use of deprecated macro: .PD
an.tmac:<stdin>:1535: style: use of deprecated macro: .PD
an.tmac:<stdin>:1538: style: use of deprecated macro: .PD
troff:<stdin>:1644: warning [page 13, line 13]: cannot break line
troff:<stdin>:1738: warning [page 13, line 53]: cannot break line
troff:<stdin>:1786: warning [page 13, line 72]: cannot break line
troff:<stdin>:2244: warning [page 16, line 69]: cannot break line
* What outcome did you expect instead?
No output (no warnings).
-.-
General remarks and further material, if a diff-file exist, are in the
attachments.