#1102724 RM: win32-loader -- RoQA; not considered worthwhile to maintain further

#1102724#5
Date:
2025-04-12 11:31:11 UTC
From:
To:
Hi ftp-master,

[Added the moreinfo tag as d-i needs adaptation first and because of the
following question.]

In bug #1089276 (win32-loader FTBFS) we're discussing the removal of
win32-loader from d-i and the archive. As I understand it this package
also has BYHAND processing to ensure it ends up at
/srv/mirrors/debian/tools/win32-loader. Does this mean we should do more
than just removing win32-loader use in d-i and filling of this bug report?

Paul

#1102724#12
Date:
2025-04-12 12:50:14 UTC
From:
To:
Hi,

Am 12. April 2025 13:31:11 MESZ schrieb Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org>:

It should be made sure, that the files under /mirror/debian/tools/win32-loader
remain until bookworm is EOL.

And keep the package in bookworm, until that's EOL.


Holger

#1102724#17
Date:
2025-05-19 07:42:12 UTC
From:
To:
Hi!

I'd be really sad to see win32-loader go away. It has been useful to me
and others in the past.

I'd be happy to take over whichever task is needed to keep having
win32-loader in Debian.

Please let me know! Bye :)

#1102724#22
Date:
2025-05-19 16:37:40 UTC
From:
To:
Hi Andrea,


I guess the first task is to figure out what needs to be done. I think
you should consult the current maintainers and depending of feedback
offer to take over the role of maintainer.

Paul

#1102724#27
Date:
2025-05-19 16:56:10 UTC
From:
To:
This is correct (obv!). Also please note that this bug will get
processed by the ftpteam unless it's marked moreinfo or reassigned. You
may consider doing either -- so long as you follow through and take over
maintainership/fix the issues for real or pinkey swear to reassign the
bug back/remove the tag (actually). Maybe set a deadline and calendar
invite as a reminder. Do keep in mind a removal isn't the worst case
here since you may always reupload the package to NEW.

Paul

#1102724#32
Date:
2025-05-19 16:57:02 UTC
From:
To:
I apologize, I take that back. moreinfo is set, I missed that. Most of
the point remains, though!