- Package:
- src:gnome-desktop
- Source:
- src:gnome-desktop
- Submitter:
- Simon McVittie
- Date:
- 2025-06-09 18:33:02 UTC
- Severity:
- normal
The version of libgnome-desktop in trixie (44.1) currently defaults to ibus-table-cangjie5 for zh_HK, but we are now looking at updating to gnome-desktop 44.3, which changes the default to ibus-cangjie: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-desktop/-/merge_requests/168 This reverts a change made in 2022 (between bullseye and bookworm) while ibus-cangjie was not being actively maintained: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ibus_table_cangjie_default_for_zh_hk I'm looking for advice from the -i18n and -l10n-chinese lists: is ibus-cangjie a better default for speakers of Chinese in Hong Kong, or should we be keeping ibus-table-cangjie5? Relatedly, the other Chinese locales with default input methods in libgnome-desktop are: - ibus-libpinyin for zh_CN; - ibus-chewing for zh_TW which match up with the two Chinese GNOME metapackages in tasksel: - task-chinese-s-gnome-desktop recommends ibus-libpinyin, matching zh_CN - task-chinese-t-gnome-desktop recommends ibus-chewing, matching zh_TW Should one of those metapackages pull in ibus-cangjie and/or ibus-table-cangjie5? If yes, which metapackage? Thanks, smcv
Hi, 在 2025/6/8 23:50, Simon McVittie 写道: I meet one people in Debconf24 who come from Hong Kong, he is a native Hong Kong people. I CC'ed this email to he, perhaps he come help answer. I come from China mainland, I use zh_CN locale. Most people live in China mainland use zh_CN locale. As most zh_CN locale user not use ibus-cangjie or ibus-table-cangjie5, so task-chinese-s-gnome-desktop should not pull in them. Perhaps the zh_TW locale user can give some feedback in debian-l10n-chinese mailing list for task-chinese-t-gnome-desktop. I also CC'ed this email to a DD, meet in Debconf24, who use zh_TW locale. :-) Regards,
Thanks!
I might be misunderstanding, but I think both zh_TW and zh_HK normally use
traditional Chinese characters, so task-chinese-t-gnome-desktop should
ideally be suitable for both?
I think in the short term I'm going to revert the upstream change, so
that we keep the Debian 12 behaviour (ibus-table-cangjie5).
If someone from Hong Kong tells us that ibus-cangjie would be better, we
can ask for a freeze exception for that change separately.
smcv