I am not a Debian Developer (DD) (and can never be, you could say I have been
DAM'ed) and have no ability to upload your package, sorry. This review is for
your information with no requirement to act upon it.
Seyed,
Review of upload: 2025-08-15 11:27
Test 1 (reproducibility): Information only, not a blocker
* Good
Test 2 (pbuilder build): Information only
* Good
Test 3 (pbuilder build --twice): Information only
* Good
Test 4 (sbuild): Information only
Lintian:
W: vkbasalt-cli: no-manual-page [usr/bin/vkbasalt]
N:
N: Each binary in /usr/bin, /usr/sbin, /bin, /sbin or /usr/games should have
N: a manual page
N:
N: Note that though the man program has the capability to check for several
N: program names in the NAMES section, each of these programs should have its
N: own manual page (a symbolic link to the appropriate manual page is
N: sufficient) because other manual page viewers such as xman or tkman don't
N: support this.
N:
N: If the name of the manual page differs from the binary by case, man may be
N: able to find it anyway; however, it is still best practice to match the
N: exact capitalization of the executable in the manual page.
N:
N: If the manual pages are provided by another package on which this package
N: depends, Lintian may not be able to determine that manual pages are
N: available. In this case, after confirming that all binaries do have manual
N: pages after this package and its dependencies are installed, please add a
N: Lintian override.
N:
N: Please refer to Manual pages (Section 12.1) in the Debian Policy Manual
N: for details.
N:
N: Visibility: warning
N: Show-Always: no
N: Check: documentation/manual
N: Renamed from: binary-without-manpage
Test 5 (ratt): Information only, not a blocker
Note: Possible false positives.
* Good
Test 6 (debian/watch): Information only
* Good
Test 7 (licenserecon): Information only
* Good
Summary
=======
Looks good here.
I would use and is common to use the same license for 'Files: *' and 'Files:
debian/*', but is not mandatory.
It would be nice for this package to have a manual page. Better that than
relying on a 'README.md'.
Tagging as 'confirmed'.
Tags
====
If a 'moreinfo' tag has been added to your RFS bug. You can remove the tag using
the line below at the top of a reply that is supplying information and/or
indicating a new upload.
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
Regards
Phil