#1111218 precious: which 8 update

#1111218#5
Date:
2025-08-15 17:23:18 UTC
From:
To:
Hi,

I will upload which 8 to unstable soon. Since your package depends on an
older which find a patch attached that builds with which 8.

best,

werdahias


- -- System Information:
Debian Release: forky/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 6.12.38+deb13-amd64 (SMP w/16 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: OpenRC (via /run/openrc), PID 1: init
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iIsEARYKADMWIQQUWTv/Sl6/b+DpcW7svtu2B7myvgUCaJ9s/xUcd2VyZGFoaWFz
QGRlYmlhbi5vcmcACgkQ7L7btge5sr7OuAD/VfGaBGXYPfjbTHD83xoXpaUjY36O
WwbvbT5YPF87EtoA/jXbS/BEhk5ATNFzFupwtRoPbNAJfPBZD9CRILVl57oB
=x3Zw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

#1111218#10
Date:
2025-08-15 20:48:47 UTC
From:
To:
Quoting Matthias Geiger (2025-08-15 19:23:18)

That said, please do read the patch you provided - it is absurd: I fail
to see how the package "precious" currently is incapable of building
with which v8, and I fail to see how your patch does *anything* to
improve the situation - I can only see it as *restricting* which version
the cargo hinting accepts, while still hinting in the Debian packaging a
wider acceptance range.

Please do tell if I am missing something here.

Kind regards,

 - Jonas

#1111218#15
Date:
2025-08-19 09:32:31 UTC
From:
To:
Hi, I just uploaded which 8.0 to unstable.

best,

werdahias

#1111218#20
Date:
2025-08-19 13:03:10 UTC
From:
To:
Quoting Matthias Geiger (2025-08-19 11:32:31)

Great. I'll update relevant packages.

 - Jonas