#1116990 hunspell-fr: spelling mistake "piétonisation" instead of "piétonnisation"

#1116990#5
Date:
2025-10-01 22:23:55 UTC
From:
To:
The 3 .dic dictionaries contain

piétonisation/S.() po:nom is:fem

as seen with

$ grep piéton *.dic
fr-classique.dic:piéton/F+() po:nom po:adj
fr-classique.dic:piétonisation/S.() po:nom is:fem
fr-classique.dic:piétonnier/F.() po:nom
fr-classique.dic:piétonniser/a0p+() po:v1_it____a
fr-reforme1990.dic:piéton/F+() po:nom po:adj
fr-reforme1990.dic:piétonisation/S.() po:nom is:fem
fr-reforme1990.dic:piétonnier/F.() po:nom
fr-reforme1990.dic:piétonniser/a0p+() po:v1_it____a
fr-toutesvariantes.dic:piéton/F+() po:nom po:adj
fr-toutesvariantes.dic:piétonisation/S.() po:nom is:fem
fr-toutesvariantes.dic:piétonnier/F.() po:nom
fr-toutesvariantes.dic:piétonniser/a0p+() po:v1_it____a

This is incorrect. The correct spelling is "piétonnisation"
(with 2 "n"):

https://www.larousse.fr/dictionnaires/francais/pi%C3%A9tonnisation/186622
https://dictionnaire.lerobert.com/definition/pietonnisation

#1116990#12
Date:
2025-12-16 13:55:11 UTC
From:
To:
Le jeudi 02 octobre 2025 à 00:23 +0200, Vincent Lefevre a écrit :

It seems that both forms exist, though the one with two “n” is indeed
more frequent: https://fr.wiktionary.org/wiki/pi%C3%A9tonisation

#1116990#17
Date:
2025-12-16 15:31:26 UTC
From:
To:
The form with 1 "n" does not appear in the official French
dictionaries:

https://www.larousse.fr/dictionnaires/francais/pi%C3%A9tonisation

gives nothing and proposes other words.

https://dictionnaire.lerobert.com/definition/pietonisation

ditto.

fr.wiktionary.org seems incorrect, just propagating incorrect
spelling. Finding a spelling on the web (or in any document,
except a dictionary) does not make it correct.

#1116990#22
Date:
2025-12-16 16:07:19 UTC
From:
To:
Le mardi 16 décembre 2025 à 16:31 +0100, Vincent Lefevre a écrit :

I don’t have a strong opinion on this topic. A natural language has no
authority defining it in practice, since it evolves according to use
(and in the case of French, there are several competing authorities
across France, Switzerland, Belgium, Québec…).

In any case, this should be forwarded upstream. The good news is that,
according to upstream website, there will soon be a new upstream taking
over development (currently there is no way to report an incorrect
translation).

#1116990#27
Date:
2025-12-17 21:37:43 UTC
From:
To:
There are some authorities for considering what is correct,
as described at

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rectifications_orthographiques_du_fran%C3%A7ais_en_1990

(this covers France and some other French-speaking countries),
and well-accepted dictionaries (Larousse, Robert) should also
be accepted. But this is not the case of Wiktionnaire.

Yes, I originally wanted to report the bug upstream, but I could not
find it. That's why I had filled bug 1116989 first.