- Package:
- src:libwiki-toolkit-plugin-ping-perl
- Submitter:
- Andreas Tille
- Date:
- 2026-08-11 05:47:02 UTC
- Severity:
- normal
Hi Dominic,
I would be interested in helping with libwiki-toolkit-plugin-ping-perl,
following the Package Salvaging procedure outlined in the Developers
Reference[1]. From what I see, the package seems to meet the criteria
for this process, and I'd like to support keeping it maintained in
Debian. As the Salvage process suggests, here is a list of the criteria
that I believe apply:
- NMU
- Bug filed against the package do not have answers from the
maintainer.
- There are QA issues with the package.
I believe the package would be a great addition to the Debian Perl
Group, and I took the liberty to create a fork of your private
repository here[2]. If you choose not to accept the ITS, its perfectly
fine if you simply take over the MR and upload the fixes inside the
package including the fix for the open bug. My goal is to make it as
easy as possible for you to join the team. Since every DD has access to
the perl-team group you can easily access the repository.
Kind regards
Andreas.
[1] https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.en.html#package-salvaging
[2] https://salsa.debian.org/perl-team/modules/packages/libwiki-toolkit-plugin-ping-perl
[3] https://salsa.debian.org/qa/tiny_qa_tools/-/wikis/Tiny-QA-tasks
Hi, I'm a member of pkg-perl but I specifically didn't add these (libwiki-toolkit-* and a few others, rdepends only of openguides AFAIK) to the perl team as they are very niche and only of interest to a tiny number of users. So I don't think they are worth bothering pkg-perl with. I will of course address substantive issues with the package but so far I see only one minor severity issue that failed to get any consensus on relevance after two years, so I don't think that's a clear signal. Cheers Dominic.
Hi, I'm a member of pkg-perl but I specifically didn't add these (libwiki-toolkit-* and a few others, rdepends only of openguides AFAIK) to the perl team as they are very niche and only of interest to a tiny number of users. So I don't think they are worth bothering pkg-perl with. I will of course address substantive issues with the package but so far I see only one minor severity issue that failed to get any consensus on relevance after two years, so I don't think that's a clear signal. Cheers Dominic.
Hi Dominic, Thanks for getting back to me and explaining your reasoning. I understand your concern about not wanting to burden the pkg-perl team with niche packages. Am Thu, Oct 09, 2025 at 11:32:24PM +0100 schrieb Dominic Hargreaves: I know this and naively assumed you had some time constraints I could help out. However, I'd like to suggest that handling "niche" Perl modules is precisely what the pkg-perl team is designed for. The automated team workflows actually make maintaining such packages less burdensome, as they help ensure consistent standards and catch issues (like outdated Vcs fields) across all packages, regardless of their user base. For instance, I noticed that libwiki-toolkit's Vcs fields still point to Alioth. Keeping these fields accurate is one of the things the team automation helps with. Moving it to the team would resolve this and similar issues automatically in the future, ensuring the package stays clean with less manual effort from any single maintainer. The merge request I prepared is ready to go and would handle this transition seamlessly. I am happy to upload it on the team's behalf or adapt it for your personal repository if you prefer. This would be a one-time action for a long-term maintenance benefit. Would you be willing to give this a try with the libwiki-toolkit package? Kind regards Andreas.
Hi Dominic, I understood you do not want this package be maintained in the Perl team. Should I close this ITS or should it remain open as some remainder that you can cherry-pick from https://salsa.debian.org/perl-team/modules/packages/libwiki-toolkit-plugin-ping-perl Please let me know when I should remove this repository once you uploaded to avoid any confusion. Kind regards Andreas. Am Fri, Oct 10, 2025 at 05:19:13PM +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille:
I'm pleased to receive the contributions, and I will incorporate them when able. Best Dominic
Hi Dominic, Am Fri, Nov 07, 2025 at 12:02:03AM +0000 schrieb Dominic Hargreaves: In what way do you want me to contribute? For me working in a Git repository in Perl team is straightforward. Kind regards Andreas.
Ping? Am Fri, Nov 07, 2025 at 07:01:56AM +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille: