Dear stable release team,

please pre-approve upload of dino-im 0.5.1 to stable-proposed-updates.
Dino upstream makes sure to separate stable bug fix releases and feature
releases. They provided me with this list of fixes in 0.5.1:

* various fixes, that may help Debian users:
- Fix incoming and outgoing unencrypted file transfers (SFS) with
  Gajim and Kaidan (1fd458e, a2dfff7, a57da8a, 3798961, af6ed0b,
  fba8529, e01e09b)
- Fix replies and reactions in rooms without history (fc67779)
- Work-around issues in libsoup (libsoup issue #473) and
  glib-networking (glib-networking issue #20) (0c3b95d)
- Fix reply button being disabled although the feature would be
  available (de24d7e). Fixes issue #1763
- Fix memory leak when sending a file (ca1b251)
- Fix incoming avatars with multiple file sources not being recognized
  correctly (bbe8384)
- Fix file in file send dialog having non-working on-hover buttons
  (0efec65)
- Fix regression, make own XMPP address selectable/copyable (2fe513e)
- Fix regression, show used account if multiple are active (4a816cc)
- Fix incomplete history fetch from server (91d8cb)
- Fix history sync resumption from partial/interrupted sync (0758344)
- Fix webcam video size selection for 16:9 ratio webcams and unknown
  framerate cameras (09aec98, c21bf33, 4bf6ee5, 4b3da13, 5a2a68c)
- Add missing icon file (7b7729a)
- Fix missing stream delay for voice processor (797937c)
* other fixes, probably not relevant to Debian users:
- Make meson file compatible with legacy versions like in Ubuntu 24.04
  LTS (fb542bc)
- Fix compilation with new vala compilers (e83a758)
- Fix SVG compatibility for glycin-based image loading (080fd3b)
- Fix version inlining in build process (7a02a5d, c0f35eb)
- Update Flatpak and appdata definition file (3528363, d664c17, 9b65c08)

dino-im 0.5.1 is in testing for more than a month now, i.e. it should be
safe to include it in stable. Upstream did not introduce new
dependencies.

TIA!

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo

We'd need to see a source debdiff of a proposed upload, please.

Regards,

Adam

Control: tags -1 - moreinfo

Sure! Attached.

Dears,
do you need more info from my side?
Or do I have to rework the changes and send a new diff?
TIA!

Hi,

This is an insufficient level of detail for such a wide-ranging update.

Thanks,

Control: tag -1 -moreinfo

Sure! This is the list of changes, I got from upstream:

- Fix incoming and outgoing unencrypted file transfers (SFS) with Gajim and Kaidan (1fd458e, a2dfff7, a57da8a, 3798961, af6ed0b, fba8529, e01e09b)
- Fix replies and reactions in rooms without history (fc67779)
- Work-around issues in libsoup (libsoup issue #473) and glib-networking (glib-networking issue #20) (0c3b95d)
- Fix memory leak when sending a file (ca1b251)
- Fix reply button being disabled although the feature would be available (de24d7e). Fixes issue #1763
- Fix incoming avatars with multiple file sources not being recognized correctly (bbe8384)
- Fix file in file send dialog having non-working on-hover buttons (0efec65)
- Make meson file compatible with legacy versions like in Ubuntu 24.04 LTS (fb542bc)
- Fix compilation with new vala compilers (e83a758)
- Fix regression, make own XMPP address selectable/copyable (2fe513e)
- Fix regression, show used account if multiple are active (4a816cc)
- Fix incomplete history fetch from server (91d8cb)
- Fix history sync resumption from partial/interrupted sync (0758344)
- Fix webcam video size selection for 16:9 ratio webcams and unknown framerate cameras (09aec98, c21bf33, 4bf6ee5, 4b3da13, 5a2a68c)
- Fix SVG compatibility for glycin-based image loading (080fd3b)
- Add missing icon file (7b7729a)
- Fix missing stream delay for voice processor (797937c)
- Fix version inlining in build process (7a02a5d, c0f35eb)
- Update Flatpak and appdata definition file (3528363, d664c17, 9b65c08)

The changes regarding meson on Ubuntu LTS, the Vala compilers, and
Flatpak are not relevant to us, but don't hurt. Everything else are
useful fixes, IMHO. I can update d/ch accordingly.

Cheers

Oops, I already sent the list in my initial bug report.
Sorry for just repeating it — didn't check my original message before
sending the last message :-(
Shall I put that description into d/ch?