#1126849 immediate segfault when handing an email from postfix to rspamd

Package:
rspamd
Source:
rspamd
Description:
Rapid spam filtering system
Submitter:
Richard
Date:
2026-02-04 14:21:03 UTC
Severity:
normal
#1126849#5
Date:
2026-02-02 13:26:38 UTC
From:
To:
Dear Maintainer,
since upgrading to Debian 13, rspamd immediately segfaults when postfix
hands it an email for scanning:
2026-02-02 14:06:48 #1168822(rspamd_proxy) rspamd_crash_sig_handler:
caught fatal signal 11(Segmentation fault), pid: 1168822, trace:
2026-02-02 14:06:48 #1168822(rspamd_proxy) log_backtrace: #0:
[0x7fb9ce435b56]: /usr/lib/rspamd/librspamd-server.so in
rspamd::log_backtrace()
2026-02-02 14:06:48 #1168822(rspamd_proxy) log_backtrace: #1:
[0x7fb9ce4064ba]: /usr/lib/rspamd/librspamd-server.so in
2026-02-02 14:06:48 #1168822(rspamd_proxy) log_backtrace: #2:
[0x7fb9cdb14def]: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 in
2026-02-02 14:06:48 #1168822(rspamd_proxy) log_backtrace: #3:
[0x7fb9ce472858]: /usr/lib/rspamd/librspamd-server.so in
2026-02-02 14:06:48 #1168822(rspamd_proxy) log_backtrace: #4:
[0x7fb9ce818af5]: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libluajit-5.1.so.2 in
2026-02-02 14:06:48 #1168822(rspamd_proxy) log_backtrace: #5:
[0x7fb9ce879132]: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libluajit-5.1.so.2 in lua_pcall
2026-02-02 14:06:48 #1168822(rspamd_proxy) log_backtrace: #6:
[0x7fb9ce3612f6]: /usr/lib/rspamd/librspamd-server.so in
2026-02-02 14:06:48 #1168822(rspamd_proxy) log_backtrace: #7:
[0x7fb9ce53d00b]: /usr/lib/rspamd/librspamd-server.so in
redisProcessCallbacks
2026-02-02 14:06:48 #1168822(rspamd_proxy) log_backtrace: #8:
[0x7fb9ce0e1c8d]: /usr/lib/rspamd/librspamd-ev.so in ev_invoke_pending
2026-02-02 14:06:48 #1168822(rspamd_proxy) log_backtrace: #9:
[0x7fb9ce0e56e3]: /usr/lib/rspamd/librspamd-ev.so in ev_run
2026-02-02 14:06:48 #1168822(rspamd_proxy) log_backtrace: #10:
[0x56099f5cac25]: rspamd: rspamd_proxy process  in localhost:11332
2026-02-02 14:06:48 #1168822(rspamd_proxy) log_backtrace: #11:
[0x7fb9ce405aeb]: /usr/lib/rspamd/librspamd-server.so in rspamd_fork_worker
2026-02-02 14:06:48 #1168822(rspamd_proxy) log_backtrace: #12:
[0x56099f5c33e0]: rspamd: rspamd_proxy process  in localhost:11332
2026-02-02 14:06:48 #1168822(rspamd_proxy) log_backtrace: #13:
[0x56099f5c3d6d]: rspamd: rspamd_proxy process  in localhost:11332
2026-02-02 14:06:48 #1168822(rspamd_proxy) log_backtrace: #14:
[0x56099f5b48a3]: rspamd: rspamd_proxy process  in localhost:11332
2026-02-02 14:06:48 #1168822(rspamd_proxy) log_backtrace: #15:
[0x7fb9cdafeca7]: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 in
2026-02-02 14:06:48 #1168822(rspamd_proxy) log_backtrace: #16:
[0x7fb9cdafed64]: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 in __libc_start_main
2026-02-02 14:06:48 #1168822(rspamd_proxy) log_backtrace: #17:
[0x56099f5b5030]: rspamd: rspamd_proxy process  in localhost:11332
2026-02-02 14:06:48 #1168822(rspamd_proxy) log_backtrace: #18:
[0xffffffffffffffff]: [0xffffffffffffffff] in
2026-02-02 14:06:48 #1168822(rspamd_proxy) rspamd_crash_sig_handler:
please see Rspamd FAQ to learn how to dump core files and how to fill a
bug report
2026-02-02 14:06:48 #1168819(main) <86f5c4>; main; rspamd_srv_handler:
cannot read from worker's srv pipe connection closed; command =
notice_hyperscan_cache

Best regards
Richard

#1126849#10
Date:
2026-02-04 14:19:48 UTC
From:
To:
It seems this issue has been fixed upstream, v3.14.3 from their own
Debian repo isn't affected.