#1126959 sbcl: Please add loong64 support in debian/rules for version 2.6.1

Package:
src:sbcl
Source:
src:sbcl
Submitter:
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Date:
2026-02-19 10:39:04 UTC
Severity:
normal
Tags:
#1126959#5
Date:
2026-02-04 16:59:52 UTC
From:
To:
Hi,

The upstream version 2.6.1 of sbcl has added support for LoongArch such
that we can add the architecture in debian/rules:

diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules
index 477b1697c..0aebe313c 100755
--- a/debian/rules
+++ b/debian/rules
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ else
 endif
 endif
#1126959#10
Date:
2026-02-05 12:29:29 UTC
From:
To:
Hello,

John Paul Adrian Glaubitz [04/Feb  5:59pm +01] wrote:

I think the comment in d/rules about these lists of architectures, and
the lists of architectures in d/control, have fallen out-of-date.

I also notice that "!sh4" appears in both the clisp lists in d/control ..

You are much more familiar with this syntax and these matters than me.
Would you be able to prepare a patch updating the comment in d/rules and
ensuring the lists in d/control are also up-to-date?
#1126959#15
Date:
2026-02-05 19:38:55 UTC
From:
To:
Hi Sean,

Absolutely. Would you mind importing upstream version 2.6.1 first?

Then I'll send the changes as a follow-up pull request.

With 2.6.1, I'll be able to test everything on loong64 as well.

Thanks,
Adrian
#1126959#20
Date:
2026-02-05 19:41:53 UTC
From:
To:
Hello,

John Paul Adrian Glaubitz [05/Feb  8:38pm +01] wrote:

I tried, but it was rejected due to Lintian failures.

So at least 2.6.1 is in git.
#1126959#25
Date:
2026-02-10 17:52:45 UTC
From:
To:
Hello,

Sean Whitton [05/Feb  7:41pm GMT] wrote:

Ping.
#1126959#30
Date:
2026-02-11 15:22:44 UTC
From:
To:
Hi Sean,

Apologies. I have had a very busy week so far. I'll try to do that the next days.

Adrian
#1126959#35
Date:
2026-02-19 10:37:38 UTC
From:
To:
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz [11/Feb  4:22pm +01] wrote:

Hello again, would you be able to work on this?  Looking forward to
fixing sbcl.