Hello,

I have unarchived #1023163 more than an hour ago:

Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2026 11:25:02 +0000
From: Debian Bug Tracking System <owner@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Processed: unarchiving 1023163, found 1023163 in 9.0.0+ds+~0.10.5-1
[...]
Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:
Bug #1023163 {Done: YOKOTA Hiroshi <yokota.hgml@gmail.com>} [calibre] calibre:
+No module named 'PyQt6.uic'
Unarchived Bug 1023163
Bug #1023163 {Done: YOKOTA Hiroshi <yokota.hgml@gmail.com>} [calibre] calibre:
+No module named 'PyQt6.uic'
Marked as found in versions calibre/9.0.0+ds+~0.10.5-1 and reopened.
Stopping processing here.

However the webfrontend still lists it as archived and closed:
ametzler@argenau:~$ lynx -dump 'https://bugs.debian.org/1023163' | head -n25 | tail -n8
   Found in version calibre/6.7.1+dfsg-1

   Fixed in version calibre/6.7.1+dfsg-5

   Done: YOKOTA Hiroshi <yokota.hgml@gmail.com>

   Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

cu Andreas

On Sat, 11 Apr 2026, Andreas Metzler wrote:n

Archived bugs take some time for the mirroring software to catch that
they have been unarchived. This is by design, but the bug itself has
been unarchived, and as soon as the mirroring catches up, it will note
that the bug has been unarchived.

I think that's a reasonable compromise, but if you feel differently, let
me know.

[...]

Hello Don,

yes that is reasonable. The web-view of the respective bug has been
updated over the night, so I think it took more than three and less than
16 hours.

cu Andreas