- Package:
- src:pd-ableton-link
- Source:
- src:pd-ableton-link
- Submitter:
- onders
- Date:
- 2026-04-23 12:31:02 UTC
- Severity:
- normal
I couldnt find any info about this specific source https://www.ableton.com/en/link/ as in watchfile and metadata this seems a valid replacement: https://github.com/libpd/abl_link
I disagree. the homepage in the control field points to the generic family of "Link" products, which I think is a good one for the packaged project. (but maybe I'm missing some "well-definition" of what the "homepage" field should contain in the first place) mfh.her.fsr IOhannes
my stance roughly homepage should take not more than two logic steps to reach information of what is used as debian source and not more than three logic steps to reach the download location for that source what is used as Debian source is more and could differ than only ableton-link
this is what debian policy mentions Debian Policy Manual 5.6.23. Homepage https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#homepage