Im giving some comments on this as a package - im sure you will get
lots of feedback about the "blend"
I think it is confusing for users to have the package and blend named
the same thing
I suggest debian-marlin-all or debian-marlin-documentation, depending
on what the package is -- i couldnt tell from the description
just as example - is this the license of the blend? (clearly not!)
the "end user" is business jargon that is confusing for non-it people.
it also adds little, and is technically incorrect - all users are
"end users", and not every "end user" is a desktop user
if your aim is desktop users you will want to make things a lot clearer!
laptops?? so i cant use it on my tablet? this seems a bit 1990s?
(also, i dont think this is actually your "goal": this seems more like
an implementaiton detail. your goal is probably more like making
something "easier to use" / "looks good" / "good performance", etc)
"normal" debian already does this. Is this package a metapackage?
But this sentence makes it sound like documentation. and missing a d
in "familiarized"
it's confusing to use "desktop" to mean the gui envitonment here, but
hardware above
"includes" isnt clear (and isnt technically correct unless this is a
huge package): do you mean that installing this package brings in
different/more applications to task-xfce4-desktop?
I also wonder whether your selection of tools is really want "end
users" want installed -- an ebook reader but no web browser?
An end user is going to find this quite baffling - we dont consider
any lib[raries?] as "provided for daily use", and are gvfs-backend,
cups-files, avahi really examples of ....anything helpful? - and they
are all in debian already: what is this blend/package doing that
task-xfce-desktop doesnt?