Dear Maintainer, Please find the updated Romanian po file translation for dpkg-program attached. It should be put as "po/ro.po" in your package build tree. If you update your template, please contact me so I can update the Romanian translation; or, if you prefer, contact the Debian Romanian mailing list <debian-l10n-romanian@lists.debian.org> for this purpose.
Hi! Thanks for the update, I've queued it locally and will be included in my next push. BTW it would be helpful if you could mark msgids that are unclear, wrong or that could be improved in the .po file with either an XXX or FIXME comment in English to make it easier to spot. Some of them I agree need a rewording, and were like this before my time, some I might have introduced where being non-native might not always help. :) I've done already an update and unification pass over all strings, and have some pending commits to push, so I hope the situation will improve with the next upstream release, but for anything remaining I'd appreciate being told (either with the above mentioned comments or with bug reports). No problem! Thanks, Guillem
Hi! Bug #1139334 in package dpkg reported by you has been fixed in the dpkg/dpkg.git Git repository. You can see the changelog below, and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://git.dpkg.org/cgit/dpkg/dpkg.git/diff/?id=dfc16a9e1 --- po: Update Romanian programs translation Closes: #1139334 Signed-off-by: Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org>
În 22.06.2026 02:15, Guillem Jover a scris: Ok, I'll leave comments with the things that seem off to me. Unfortunately, when taking over an old project, the new person in charge is “to blame” both for the old mistakes/errors made by others and for the new ones he or she introduces. This intention and effort to fix old errors/mistakes (and possibly some not-so-old ones) is to be appreciated. In my future "bug-wishlists", I will mention the presence (if any) of these comments in the attached ro.po file. Tks! What is the current status of the fix for bug #1139332, which contains the updated translation of “dselect”?
Hi! Ah, thanks for insisting! I assumed I had already dealt with that at the time, but re-checking now noticed I never saw it because as you mentioned (which I thought you were referring to text in the translation, and not in the bug metadata) was filed against deselect instead of dselect. I've reassigned the report and have queued the update as well for inclusion. Thanks, Guillem
Hi! Tks! What is the current status of the fix for bug #1139332, which contains the updated translation of "dselect"? Ah, thanks for insisting! I assumed I had already dealt with that at the time, but re-checking now noticed I never saw it because as you mentioned (which I thought you were referring to text in the translation, and not in the bug metadata) was filed against deselect instead of dselect. I've reassigned the report and have queued the update as well for inclusion. Ok, thanks!; in this case bug #1139332 should also be marked as pending 😉