Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for an updated version of my package "binclock".

 * Package name     : binclock
 * Version          : 1.5-15
 * Upstream contact : Nico Golde <nico@ngolde.de>
 * URL              : https://www.ngolde.de
 * License          : GPL-2+

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

https://mentors.debian.net/package/binclock/

Changes since the last upload:

  * Fix remaining Lintian issues.
  * Update Debian copyright information.
  * Fix Debian changelog metadata.
  * Improve Debian package metadata.

Regards,
Danial maleki

Bug#1143918: RFS: binclock -- binary clock for console with color support
Bug#1143919: RFS: binclock -- binary clock for console with color support
Bug#1143920: RFS: binclock -- binary clock for console with color support
Bug#1143922: RFS: ucpp -- embeddable, quick and light C preprocessor
Bug#1143925: RFS: binclock 1.5-13 [updated] -- binary clock for text terminals with color support
Bug#1143926: RFS: ucpp 1.3.2-7 -- embeddable, quick and light C preprocessor
Bug#1143927: RFS: binclock 1.5-13 -- binary clock for text terminals with color support
Bug#1143929: RFS: binclock 1.5-14 -- binary clock for text terminals with color support
Bug#1143932: RFS: binclock 1.5-14 -- binary clock for text terminals with color support
Bug#1143934: RFS: binclock 1.5-15 -- binary clock for text terminals with color support

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1143860#10

in my words:  show awareness of working with real people


Regards
Geert Stappers


P.S.

real people:  humans like you and me, knowing how valuable time is

Dear Geert,Thank you for your feedback and guidance.I understand your
point about working with real people and respecting their time. I
apologize for the duplicate RFS bugs and the confusion they caused.I
have now:1. Closed all duplicate RFS bugs for binclock2. Kept only
Bug#1143934 for the current version 1.5-153. Ensured that the package
is ready for reviewI will make sure to avoid creating multiple RFS
bugs in the future and will only file one RFS when the package is
fully ready.Thank you for your patience and understanding.Best
regards,Danial maleki

Dear Geert,

Thank you again for your guidance and for taking the time to point out the
issues with the duplicate RFS requests.

As you suggested, I have now:

1. Closed all duplicate RFS bugs for binclock (1143932, 1143933, 1143935)
2. Kept only Bug#1143934 as the single valid RFS for binclock 1.5-15

I understand the importance of respecting the time and effort of people in
the Debian community. In the future, I will make sure to only file one RFS
per package after the package is fully ready.

Thank you for your patience and understanding.

Best regards,
Danial maleki

Hello,

Please only include one changelog entry - in this case it would be under -13. We don't sponsor uploads with multiple changelog entries.

Otherwise, please see the comments on mentors, and remove the moreinfo flag once it's ready again.

Best regards,
Simon Quigley
tsimonq2@debian.org