Hi,

After the upgrade of openjfx from major version 11 to 21, the package is no
more buildable on riscv64.
This is ANAIS, ROM, ROP.

Thus, could you please remove the binary packages openjfx and libopenjfx-jni
from unstable?

For the report: this request for removal has nothing to do with #1149633 (asking for removal on s390x), hence a different bug.

Thanks a lot,

- --
Pierre Gruet
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=RoCX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Hello,

What is the actual reason that OpenJFX is no longer supported on riscv64?
Does it require native codegen support in Java which riscv64 doesn't have?

Adrian

Hello Adrian,

Le 02/10/2026 à 11:14, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit :

Thanks for asking; the issues I met were with Assembler. There are some
.asm files in the source and I ran into issues when compiling them.
Sadly I was not able to fix this.

Have a good day,

Hi Pierre,

Did you report that problem upstream? If there is native RISC-V code, I would
assume it's still supported upstream and they would be interested in fixing it.

Adrian

Hi Adrian,

Le 02/10/2026 à 11:32, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit :

I am in the progress of doing so, yes! I try to gather some more
elements to try to be useful for upstream... I hope this will help indeed.

All the best,

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

libopenjfx-jni | 11.0.11+1-7+b1 | riscv64
   openjfx | 11.0.11+1-7+b1 | riscv64

------------------- Reason -------------------
ANAIS; not buildable on riscv64
----------------------------------------------

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next
dinstall run at the earliest.

Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.

Bugs which have been reported against this package are not automatically
removed from the Bug Tracking System.  Please check all open bugs and
close them or re-assign them to another package if the removed package
was superseded by another one.

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using https://snapshot.debian.org/.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1149681@bugs.debian.org.

The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/1149681

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Thorsten Alteholz (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)