https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/frescobaldi

Migration status for frescobaldi (4.0.5+ds1-1 to 4.0.7+ds1-1): BLOCKED: Rejected/violates migration policy/introduces a regression
Issues preventing migration:
∙ ∙ frescobaldi/loong64 has unsatisfiable dependency
∙ ∙ frescobaldi/ppc64el has unsatisfiable dependency
∙ ∙ frescobaldi/s390x has unsatisfiable dependency


Due to:
debian/frescobaldi.substvars:python3:Depends=python3-ly (>= 0.9.5), python3-pyqt6, python3-pyqt6.qtwebengine, python3-qpageview, python3:any

Thanks.  Looks like this was previously dealt with by removing binaries
on some architectures (https://bugs.debian.org/1131561) but not actually
taking any measures to ensure that they wouldn't come back on the next
upload.

But it looks like the only bits of Frescobaldi that require QtWebEngine
are the SVG view and the LilyPond documentation browser, so we can
probably reduce this to a Recommends.

debian/control already has:
  Depends: ..., python3-pyqt6.qtwebengine [amd64 arm64 armhf i386],...

The problem is that this doesn't help when ${python3:Depends} also
creates a dependency.

python3-qpageview seems to have the same problem, but in both
${python3:Depends} and debian/control.

cu
Adrian

Yes, I know all this, I just didn't write it out :-)

However, as of the latest upstream version, Frescobaldi has a hard
dependency on QtPdf, which is _also_ only available on
amd64/arm64/armhf/i386 (possibly for related reasons; I didn't go all
the way down that rabbit-hole).  So rather than fiddling around with
conditionalizing dependencies any further, I think it makes sense to
just restrict the Architecture field.

Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -2 ftp.debian.org
Control: retitle -2 RM: frescobaldi [ppc64el riscv64 s390x] -- ROM; Depends on architecture-restricted python3-pyqt6.qtpdf
Control: severity -2 normal

Or indeed build-depend on python3-pyqt6.{qtpdf,qtwebengine}, which
achieves the same thing more elegantly.

Archive team, please could you remove frescobaldi from ppc64el, riscv64,
and s390x again?  This is similar to https://bugs.debian.org/1131561,
but the next upload of frescobaldi will make sure that these
uninstallable binaries don't come back again.

Thanks,