- Package:
- lists.debian.org
- Source:
- lists.debian.org
- Submitter:
- Date:
- 2025-02-08 02:36:39 UTC
- Severity:
- wishlist
- Tags:
the archives at lists.debian.org only provide gziped mboxes of the older months, and then only when they are above a certain size. i think providing gziped mboxes would be useful for newer months also, so that people could download them and read them locally, as opposed to only being able to do it online and through the web.
reassign 161440 listarchives thanks list.debian.org is only looks after creating and managing lists. The virtual package listarchive handles the archivies. An easy mistake to make. Reassigned. Anand
In: http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2003/debian-user-200302/msg02997.html referring to mbox files for the Debian Mailing lists Colin Watson said: "They're stored on master.debian.org in one-per-month mbox format, but as far as I can tell not exported." I hope that this means that a resolution to this bug would be a simple copy and make available script. In this bug Graham Wilson <bob@decoy.wox.org> says that "the archives at lists.debian.org only provide gziped mboxes of the older months, and then only when they are above a certain size." I cannot find these gziped mbox files. Is this a mistake, or have they been removed? Drew Daniels
Wouldn't compressing the mailboxes by month be enough of a barrier? I wouldn't think that robots that crawl the web for email addresses would go through the trouble of decompressing files first. The email addresses are already available online anyhow, right?
tag 161440 wontfix tag 181385 wontfix thanks Hi, the reason mbox archives are currently not provided via the web archive is a policy decision, not a technical one. To reflect this, I'm tagging the bugs wontfix. Kind regards T.
Hi,
Can I at least have a link or copy of this policy? Is delivery via an
alternative open mechanism against policy?
One of my problems is that I will sometimes stumble across messages that I
want to reply to from lists that I'm not subscribed to. It's been an extra
hurdle to copy out the appropriate email headers in order to respect
people's wishes when replying. Examples of headers are the
Mail-Followup-To, and Message-ID headers (for composing in reply to
headers to maintain proper threading). Being able to download an
individual message like I propose in 161440 helps with this as does being
able to download the entire mbox archive like I propose in 181385.
I believe my problem is technical, though the choice not to provide the
convenience of mbox archives for non-developers is policy. Perhaps the
problem in my paragraph above is worthy of a separate bug?
Having the full original text of a message could also display information
not available through alternative sources.
Having mbox archives can also allow me to pick alternative email reading
interfaces when I find a thread that I'm interested in.
Thanks,
Drew Daniels
Hi, provide mboxes) for this bug is readily available[1], but the Listmaster team has decided to not deploy it. web. It is not a policy written in a policy document. My message to the bug is a public announcement of that policy, so if you want to discuss the policy, link to my message to these bugs. As to the rationale: Making mboxes available facilitates harvesting of mail addresses even more than the web archives. No, please do not file a separate bug. We already have these two bugs about accessing list archives through other means than the HTML web pages. If it helps, you could try to discuss this on #debian-lists on IRC before continuing here or per email. Having implemented the above-mentioned scripts to provide mboxes, me might in arguing the case against having them not be too compelling. Kind regards Thomas 1. This is not quite as "duh" as it sounds because we do not presently store spam-cleansed mboxes.
Dear Customer, Your item has arrived at the FedEx Post Office at January 23, but the courier was unable to deliver parcel to you. You can download the shipment label attached! Thank you for making business with us, Aaron Flynn, Delivery Clerk.
Dear Customer, We can not deliver your parcel arrived at February 17. Download postal receipt attached to e-mail! Many thanks, Dan Oneil, UPS Chief Station Manager.
Final Notice. You are among the beneficiaries of 2024/2025 grant for all scam victims and relatives reconfirm your email if active for more details Thank You. Regards Mr. Rowland Cole ( Financial Crimes Enforcement Network)
Final Notice. You are among the beneficiaries of 2024/2025 grant for all scam victims and relatives reconfirm your email if active for more details Thank You. Regards Mr. Rowland Cole ( Financial Crimes Enforcement Network)
Final Notice. You are among the beneficiaries of 2024/2025 grant for all scam victims and relatives reconfirm your email if active for more details Thank You. Regards Mr. Rowland Cole ( Financial Crimes Enforcement Network)