#270573 meta: sending reports about apt-proxy gives an error report as reply-mail

#270573#5
Date:
2004-09-08 04:50:46 UTC
From:
To:
When sending a bug report about apt-proxy, I got the following confusing
mail in reply:

   Unfortunately it's currently impossible to use the Debian mailing lists with
   a e-mail address that matches procmail's check for mail coming from a daemon.

   This means that a username may not have "mail", "admin", "root", "master",
   "list" or similar strings in it (see procmailrc(5) for "FROM_DAEMON").

   We apologize for the inconvenience and ask you to consider using some other
   username.

   Below please find all headers of your mail:
   --
   > From listmaster@newmurphy.debian.org  Tue Sep  7 16:23:08 2004
   > Return-Path: <listmaster@newmurphy.debian.org>
   > X-Original-To: listmaster@lists.debian.org
   > Received: by newmurphy.debian.org (Postfix, from userid 38)
   >       id 14F932E5F9; Tue,  7 Sep 2004 16:23:08 -0500 (CDT)
   > X-From_:debbugs@bugs.debian.org  Tue Sep  7 16:23:08 2004
   > X-Original-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
   > Received: from spohr.debian.org (spohr.debian.org [128.193.0.4])
   >       by newmurphy.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB6CA2E603
   >       for <debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org>; Tue,  7 Sep 2004 16:23:07 -0500 (CDT)
   > Received: from debbugs by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
   >       id 1C4nLm-000385-00; Tue, 07 Sep 2004 14:18:02 -0700
   > X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
   > Subject: Bug#259989: apt-proxy: extremely high cpu usage and very low throughput => unusable
   > Reply-To: Marc Lehmann <root@plan9.de>, 259989@bugs.debian.org
   > Resent-From: Marc Lehmann <root@plan9.de>
   > Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
   > Resent-Cc: Otavio Salvador <otavio@debian.org>
   > Resent-Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2004 21:18:02 UTC
   > Resent-Message-ID: <handler.259989.B259989.10945909058840@bugs.debian.org>
   > X-Debian-PR-Message: report 259989
   > X-Debian-PR-Package: apt-proxy
   > X-Debian-PR-Keywords: experimental
   > Received: via spool by 259989-submit@bugs.debian.org id=B259989.10945909058840
   >           (code B ref 259989); Tue, 07 Sep 2004 21:18:02 UTC
   > Received: (at 259989) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Sep 2004 21:01:45 +0000
   > Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10]
   >       by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
   >       id 1C4n61-0002IE-00; Tue, 07 Sep 2004 14:01:45 -0700

#270573#10
Date:
2004-09-08 12:16:54 UTC
From:
To:
reassign lists.debian.org
merge 27454 270573
thanks mate

What's confusing about the mail?

#270573#15
Date:
2004-09-08 15:06:39 UTC
From:
To:
It is no information I requested, and it has nothing to do with my mail (I
didn't use such a username). I find that rather confusing. Why do I get
mail from debian about mail addresses I have nothing to do with? Why does
itt ell me that I used an unacceptable mail address when I didn't do so?

I guess most people will just assume that their bug-report was lost...

#270573#22
Date:
2004-09-11 09:52:10 UTC
From:
To:
How is this bugs.debian.org? The message is from debian-bugs-dist, which
is the responsibility of lists.debian.org.

The bug tracking system didn't mangle Marc's mail on the way through.
The message shown on the bug page for #259989 is exactly what was
received, with the addition of SpamAssassin headers.

Cheers,

#270573#35
Date:
2025-02-08 04:49:24 UTC
From:
To:
Final Notice.

You are among the beneficiaries of 2024/2025 grant for all scam victims and relatives reconfirm your email if active for more details

Thank You.

Regards
Mr. Rowland Cole
( Financial Crimes Enforcement Network)