If ddd suggests info-browser instead of info then it won't complain when
being installed on a system with pinfo (my favourite info viewer of the
moment).
Could you please put this change in the next version (probably not worth a
new version just for that feature though - make this a wishlist item).

Hi Russell,

pinfo looks nice, but it's too unstable for my taste at the moment.

The problem is that the "info-browser" virtual package does not imply
there's a standard way of invoking the info-browser.

It would be possible though to modify DDD to try the various
command-line-invocable info-browsers, similar to the way it tries various
web-browsers. Currently, the "info" command name is hardwired into DDD.

Greetings,
Ray

Hi Ray,

"J.H.M. Dassen" <jdassen@wi.leidenuniv.nl> wrote:

Could you give some examples, where it's unstable? Only with the help of
the users, we can improve pinfo, so please tell me the bugs or problems
and I and the author will try to solve them. Also wishlist-bugs are
welcome.

Cheers
       Christian

Closing this ticket because it is out-dated and there was answer from
reporter to the maintainers questions, for years. No
interest the reporter.

This happens in interest of Debian GNU/Linux project because it harms
the
project keeping tickets of that age open without any activity, decision
or
action taken.

Feel free to re-open or open a fresh report.