#368731 TeX Policy and TeXLive packages disagree on TEXMFMAIN usage

#368731#5
Date:
2006-05-24 13:54:30 UTC
From:
To:
As discussed previously, /usr/share/texmf/web2c/* probably must stay,
but the dvips, xdvi, and perhaps texconfig subdirectories can move to
TEXMFDIST.  And /usr/share/texmf/doc/tetex/ always was a bug...

Regards, Frank

#368731#10
Date:
2006-05-24 14:50:33 UTC
From:
To:
$ ls /usr/share/texmf/web2c/
aleph.pool  mktexdir.opt  mktex.opt  omega.pool       texmf.cnf@
mf.pool     mktexnam*     mktexupd*  pdfetex-pl.pool  tex.pool
mktexdir*   mktexnam.opt  mp.pool    pdfetex.pool

and also necessary is
$ ls /usr/share/texmf/texconfig/
generic  README  tcfmgr*  tcfmgr.map  vt100  xterm

the rest can go (or at least is gone in texlive).

Best wishes

Norbert
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Norbert Preining <preining AT logic DOT at>             Università di Siena
gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094      fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76  A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MOLESBY (n.)
The kind of family that drives to the seaside and then sits in the car
with all the windows closed, reading the Sunday Express and wearing
sidcups (q.v.)
			--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff

#368731#15
Date:
2006-05-24 15:09:51 UTC
From:
To:
Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> wrote:

Aha - are generic, vt100 and xterm directories or files?  We have

$ ls -R /usr/share/texmf/texconfig/
/usr/share/texmf/texconfig/:
g  generic  README  tcfmgr  tcfmgr.map  v  x

/usr/share/texmf/texconfig/g:
generic

/usr/share/texmf/texconfig/v:
vt100

/usr/share/texmf/texconfig/x:
xterm

where the files in the subdirectories are

$ file /usr/share/texmf/texconfig/x/xterm
/usr/share/texmf/texconfig/x/xterm: RISC OS archive (spark format)

Regards, Frank

#368731#20
Date:
2006-05-24 16:03:19 UTC
From:
To:
all files.

Aehmm, aehhemmm???!?!??!

$ file  /usr/share/texmf/texconfig/xterm
/usr/share/texmf/texconfig/xterm: Compiled terminfo entry

???
tetex is strange ;-) Or is it sarge?

Best wishes

Norbert
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dr. Norbert Preining <preining AT logic DOT at> Università di Siena gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SILESIA (n. medical) The inability to remember, at the critical moment, which is the better side of a boat to be seasick off. --- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff
#368731#25
Date:
2006-05-24 16:13:12 UTC
From:
To:
Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> wrote:

It's sarge.  But anyway, is this file actually used?  I guess, on a
Debian system it should be possible to fire up dialog without having
application-specific terminfo files.  Not that I knew what their purpose
is...

Regards, Frank

#368731#30
Date:
2006-05-26 10:33:57 UTC
From:
To:
On 24.05.06 Frank Küster (frank@debian.org) wrote:

Hi,
Isn't that the same as #350992? Should we close the other one?

H.

#368731#35
Date:
2006-05-26 11:12:03 UTC
From:
To:
merge 368731 350992
thanks

Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de> wrote:

Yes; when I encountered it while testing tetex-src, I had problems
accessing the BTs, and filed it as a reminder.

Rather merge, since there's relevant information in both.

Regards, Frank