Hi. I have a folder with really long names and Nautilus tends to not display each file name completely. Some time before (I think in 2.16) the file names were completely shown and I'm accustomed to the old behaviour. Right now even regular file names in my home directory are not fully displayed. Is this intentional? I think that if file names are going to be cut off, there should at least be a tooltip that comes up showing the entire file name when mouse "hovers" over file name (sort of what happens in iceape/iceweasel when hovering over bookmark names which are not fully displayed). I hope this is not impossible. Thanks.
Le dimanche 06 mai 2007 à 19:26 -0400, José Alburquerque a écrit : Are you sure you tried with 2.18.1-2 ? This was a bug in 2.18.1-1 which should have been fixed now.
Closing bug as the submitter's e-mail is not reachable. Le lundi 07 mai 2007 à 09:19 +0200, Mail Delivery System a écrit : -- .''`. : :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code. `. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to `- our own. Resistance is futile.
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: By closing this report, does that mean that the bug will be taken care of in the future. By what I understand from the explanation you provided, this bug appeared in version 2.18.1-1 but I'm sure I'm running 2.18.1-2 (see command below) and I know the file names are still cut off on this system: [08:17][jose@sweety:~]$ dpkg -l nautilus Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name Version Description +++-==============-==============-============================================ ii nautilus 2.18.1-2 file manager and graphical shell for GNOME [08:17][jose@sweety:~]$ I hope you didn't close this report because you could not reach my e-mail but I don't think you should have any problems because it is a POP account and I get e-mail even when my system is down. Please inform me of what will happen. Thank you.
reopen 422563 found 422563 2.18.1-2 stop Reopening the bug; I don't know whether you'll get my mail, but Josselin's reply to you probably did not reach you: could you do something to allow it through? Bye,
Hello, I just wanted to add that I too experience this problem on sid (2.18.1-2). I'm happy to provide info you may need to help resolve this issue. Thanks!
severity 422563 normal merge 422563 423660 forwarded 422563 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=410361 thanks Le mardi 08 mai 2007 à 15:59 -0400, José Alburquerque a écrit : Le dimanche 13 mai 2007 à 20:25 +0200, Matthias Bläsing a écrit : This behavior was changed between 2.16 and 2.18 because formerly, nautilus would set the column width to that of the longest filename, which was very unfriendly towards too long filenames. In 2.18, the window is always opened without a horizontal scrollbar and the filenames are cut. This means, you only have to resize your window (or remove columns you don't use) to get the width you want. The remaining problem is that, while the window size is remembered, the columns widths are not. Which is not nice for those like you who like to have a horizontal scrollbar in the list view. Cheers,
Le mardi 15 mai 2007 à 23:42 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit : I have uploaded nautilus 2.18.1-3 which adds a minimum size for the name column. Do you find this an improvement and do you have more suggestions, especially about the minimum size value (currently 16 characters)?
Josselin Mouette wrote: Thanks. It does look like the name column is not as small as it was (really appreciate it). I noticed by re-reading the bug report that something was mentioned about windows remembering their column widths. Is this possible? I think this would fix the problem completely.
José Alburquerque wrote: I was just noticing that if I open my home folder, all the columns except the name column are as wide as the longest field and a horizontal scrollbar is included without me resizing or anything (I've included a shot). I sort of liked it better when the name field was also as wide as the longest field. Too bad that's been taken away :-(. P.S. I didn't reply earlier because I was upgrading my system and was offline for a couple of days.
Le vendredi 18 mai 2007 à 19:57 -0400, José Alburquerque a écrit : Yes, that's the proposed solution, but it requires more in-depth changes to the code, which means it won't happen in a snap.
Dear Customer, UPS courier was unable to contact you for your parcel delivery. You can download the shipment label attached! Kind thoughts, Stanley Blake, UPS Parcels Operation Agent.
Dear Customer, We can not deliver your parcel arrived at March 22. You can find more details in this e-mail attachment! Most sincerely, Steven Mason, UPS Parcels Delivery Clerk.