- Package:
- qa.debian.org
- Source:
- qa.debian.org
- Submitter:
- picca frederic
- Date:
- 2021-02-19 13:27:08 UTC
- Severity:
- wishlist
Hello In the TODO "frame" of PTS you tell to the maintainer to upgrade there package from policy version to version + n. Instead of pointing directly to the debian policy, could you link to another page with this debian policy + the relevant policy check list for upgrading the package. so it would be easier for maintainers to know what to do for the policy upgrade of the package. Thanks Frederic
Hi, I don't think that there's a web variant of "upgrading-checklist.gz" contained in the Debian policy. If the Debian policy team accept maintaing such a web page (or if some mechanism auto-update such a page in the web site), then we can probably do that. Otherwise I'm not really in favor of this, such a a page shouldn't be maintained by the PTS itself. Cheers,
Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org> writes: There is an HTML version of upgrading-checklist in the debian-policy package source. It's not currently shipped in the package, but we could add it easily enough. I'm not sure that it's any more useful than the text version, though. It's almost entirely a <pre> block.
On Sun, 08 Jun 2008 18:07:41 -0700 Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> wrote: The interesting part of the htlm version would be the link to the debian policy sections at the end of each task of the checklist. So it would be nice in the PTS to point to that checklist upgrade which refer to the debian policy. What do you think ? Frederic
picca <picca@synchrotron-soleil.Fr> writes: I agree that it would be nice, but currently we don't maintain such a list in HTML with links to Debian Policy sections and doing so is somewhat annoying right now. I'm not sure that I'm willing to commit to doing that, although I certainly agree that it would be nice to have. The links should really be generated automatically somehow (and the section numbers should be automatically resolved), but this is not at all easy to do at the moment.
What about using asciidoc + a special macro to generate automatically thoses links ? Frederic
Feel free to volunteer for the task! Russ will gladly accept a patch for it I guess. We always welcome help. :-) Cheers,
I have just check the source of the debian policy and it will not be easy...
Indeed the sections (ex 4.1) in all html files generated from the docbook files are not
numbered with ... numbers (aka 4.1) but are named the human way...
It would have be easier to generate files like this
policy.html/{number}.{section}.html or even better all in one file policy.html with named references.
But I know nothing about docbook so I can not help reformating all the policy.
See you
Frederic
PICCA Frédéric-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr> writes: Indeed, this is exactly why it's hard. (Plus, it's DebianDoc-SGML, not DocBook.)
Dear Customer, We can not deliver your parcel arrived at February 12. Please check the attachment for details! Yours truly, Russell Fulton, UPS Support Clerk.
Dear Customer, Your item has arrived at February 16, but our courier was not able to deliver the parcel. Review the document that is attached to this e-mail! All the best, Herman Santos, UPS Parcels Delivery Manager.
Dear Customer, We can not deliver your parcel arrived at February 25. You can download the shipment label attached! Many thanks, Lawrence Mcgowan, UPS Senior Station Manager.
Dear Customer, We can not deliver your parcel arrived at February 25. You can download the shipment label attached! Many thanks, Lawrence Mcgowan, UPS Senior Station Manager.
Hallo, Ich habe dir eine Mail geschickt, aber keine Antwort von dir, warum? Eddie