#592317 developers-reference: Document the communication channels and what's expected from DD in terms of communication/marketing #592317
- Package:
- developers-reference
- Source:
- developers-reference
- Submitter:
- Raphael Hertzog
- Date:
- 2010-08-16 09:03:05 UTC
- Severity:
- wishlist
Package: developers-reference Version: 3.4.3 Severity: wishlist In the publicity Bof at debconf, we agreed that we need to better communicate to DD the various communication channels that are available and the way that they are expected to use them. Among important things: - we want to make sure that people use d-d-a only for stuff relevant to developers only, other announces or press-releases ought to be sent to debian-news or debian-announce via the press team - we want developers to use wiki.debian.org/DeveloperNews if they have stuff that's not worth a single mail to d-d-a - we want contributors to suggest entries for the Debian Project News by sending mails to debian-publicity - we want people to coordinate announces/press releases with debian-publicity@l.d.o or press@debian.org (only for announces that should not leak via the ML) - we want DD to know that they can help because they have commit rights to the DPN svn repository Maybe people from debian-publicity have other items to suggest. Cheers,
I don't think this is an appropriate recommendation. If someone thinks a given bit of news is relevant to non-developers, it's fine for it to be repeated on debian-news or debian-announce; but debian-devel-announce is the single list that all developers are required to subscribe to, so if it's information that is relevant to developers *as well*, it should still go to that list.
Hi, I'm new here so ignore me if this doesn't make any sense, but could debian-devel-announce itself be subscribed to debian-announce? A couple of large software companies I've worked for had internal mailing lists set up like that, with some groups being supersets of others.
d-d-a should be for stuff relevant to developers. It does not seems reasonable to block something because it can be relevant to non-developers, especially since almost everything posted to d-d-a is relevant to some non-developers. Do we really want that ? debian-devel seems a better choice since it allows people to reply more easily that wiki.debian.org/DeveloperNews. DeveloperNews can then add a link to the thread. Cheers,
It's not "blocking". We just want people to think about it and decide whether the slight delay is worth the effore because the message will reach more people. We want people to post to -devel and write a short summary with a link in DeveloperNews so that it's also posted to d-d-a for those not following debian-devel. Cheers,