- Package:
- doc-debian
- Source:
- doc-debian
- Submitter:
- "Francesco Poli \(wintermute\)"
- Date:
- 2026-01-25 10:59:02 UTC
- Severity:
- serious
- Tags:
- Blocked By:
-
Bug Title 388141 87
www.debian.org SPI copyright claim not legally valid until all contributors are contacted for relicensing serious stable testing unstable 6 months ago
Hi! As you already know, the documents taken from the official Debian website are not really copyrighted by SPI: http://bugs.debian.org/388141 Moreover, those documents are licensed under the terms of the Open Publication License, Draft v1.0 or later, and thus fail to comply with the DFSG: http://bugs.debian.org/238245 http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/03/msg00226.html This is a (two-fold) issue for the Debian website, and is still unfixed, unfortunately. But it is an even worse issue for the doc-debian package, which is shipped in the main archive! I am filing this bug report, in the hope that this problem gets solved before wheezy is released. Of course, this bug report is to be marked as blocked by #388141 and by #238245: those two bugs should be fixed first; after that, the debian/copyright file of doc-debian should be updated accordingly. Thanks for your great contributions to the Debian Project!
Hi, Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote: [...] [...] Many parts of www.debian.org are already relicensed by now. Maybe this bug could be resolved by updating the copyright information and calling it a day (update: no). Here's a quick copyright survey. Of course most of the details below are only guesses. Still to find: * Raul Miller's wishes for the part of the constitution he wrote * origins of debian-manifesto and source-unpack.txt * social contract license Files: doc/bug-* License: GPL-2 Origin: package debbugs Files: doc/constitution.1.0.wml History: Added to webwml under current filename by Manoj 2003-10-31. Added to webwml by Darren Benham, 1998-12-04, after ratification. Amended by Ian Jackson and Darren Benham, 1998-11 and 1998-10 (see -devel). From Ian Jackson's website (~ian/debian-organisation.html), 1998-09. v0.8 proposed by Ian 1998-05-28 (see -devel). v0.7 proposed by Ian 1998-04-27 (see -devel). v0.6.1 proposed by Ian 1998-04-07 (see -devel). v0.6 proposed by Ian 1998-04-06 (see -devel). v0.5.1 proposed by Ian 1998-04-03 (see -devel). v0.5 proposed by Ian 1998-04-02 (see -devel). v0.4 proposed by Ian 1998-03-26 (see -devel). v0.3 proposed by Ian 1998-03-20 (see -devel). v0.2 proposed by Ian 1998-03-19 (see -devel). initial version (v0.1) published by Ian 1998-03-19 (see -devel). Copyright: 1998, Ian Jackson License: Expat or GPL-2+ http://people.debian.org/~spaillard/website/relicensing/www-relicensing-ok Files: doc/constitution.1.1.wml History: Added to webwml under current filename 2003-10-31 Condorcet/cloneproof SSD voting GR: 2003-06-22 Wording: 2002-10-16 (see -vote) etc Full recommendation from voting methods committee: 2002-08-21 (see -vote). First recommendation from voting methods committee: 2002-02-11 (see -vote). Copyright: 1998, Ian Jackson 2002, Raul Miller 2002, Manoj Srivasta License: OPL? Files: doc/constitution.1.2.wml History: Added to webwml under current filename 2006-09-24 Nontechnical policy maintenance GR: 2003-10-31 Tightened wording: 2003-09-23 (on -vote) Protecting foundational documents: 2000-10-10 (on -vote) Wording, part 1: 2000-10-10 (on -vote) Copyright: 1998, Ian Jackson 2002, Raul Miller 2002, 2003, Manoj Srivasta License: OPL? Files: doc/constitution.1.3.wml History: Added to webwml under current filename 2008-02-21 Assets handling GR: 2006-09-24 Proposal: 2006-07-20 (on -vote) Drafting seems to have happened in the previous month. Copyright: 1998, Ian Jackson 2002, Raul Miller 2002, 2003, 2006, Manoj Srivasta License: OPL? Files: doc/constitution.wml History: Published copy reflecting DPL election GR: 2008-02-21 Proposal: 2007-07-31 (on -vote) Copyright: 1998, Ian Jackson 2002, Raul Miller 2002, 2003, 2006, Manoj Srivasta 2007, Anthony Towns License: OPL? Files: doc/debian-manifesto doc/source-unpack.txt History: ? Copyright: ? License: ? Note: not on website Files: doc/Makefile History: ? Copyright: ? License: ? Files: doc/social-contract.1.0.wml doc/social-contract.wml History: Developed in private, as far as I can tell. Only public signs of it are 1997-06-08 on debian-devel and the result on debian-announce, 1997-07-04. . Amended to clarify some points --- in particular avoiding unnecessary references to software --- around 2003-12-27 (on -vote) Copyright: 1997, Bruce Perens (?) 2003, Branden Robinson (?) 2003, Andrew Suffield (?) License: OPL? CC-BY-2.5?
Hello Jonathan, Thanks for the updated information. However, in the listing of documents you indicate that some of the versions of the constitution are still under the OPL license and, in addition, in doc-debian we have provide additional documentation (such as information about bug handling, taken from http://www.debian.org/Bugs/) that seems to still be OPL. I would rather wait for the copyright notice in each of these pages to change before I change debian/copyright and update the status. Right now all of them point to the boilerplate page http://www.debian.org/license which still mentions that OPL is the current license for all the documents previous to January 25th, 2012. Hopefully, when #388141 is resolved for all documents we will be able to update debian/copyright and close this bug too. Regards Javier
Hi Javier, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino wrote: Yes, if I understand correctly then Raul Miller's text on the voting system used (including handling of supermajorities) was never explicitly licensed under a DFSG-free license. I do not see Raul on the list of people being contacted for http://bugs.debian.org/388141 --- I am not even sure if he had an alioth account --- and meanwhile I think it would be worthwhile to find his wishes to get the license of this foundational document clear. I might have not looked carefully enough, but from a quick glance, that seemed to come from GPL-2 source (the documentation is maintained with the rest of the debbugs codebase). That's fine with me. I mostly meant to give a summary for Francesco of the current status of these documents. I also agree with you that the /licenses page online should be updated when their license status is clear, not just doc-debian's copyright file. Thanks for the quick feedback. Jonathan
Hi Jonathan, hi Javier! Thanks to you both for following up on this issue. [...] Well, even though the issue with doc-debian is definitely part of the larger issue with the official Debian website (www.debian.org), I think that solving the part that affects doc-debian (a package shipped in Debian main, as I said!) should be carried on at a higher priority. I think that the copyright holders for the documents shipped in doc-debian should be tracked down and contacted, in order to ask (persuade) them to agree to the re-licensing under the disjunction "Expat or GPL-2+" (as is being done, I hope!, for the rest of www.debian.org). The collected "OK" answers should of course be contributed to the www.debian.org re-licensing effort. I hope this can be done in the short term. Thanks a lot for taking this issue seriously! Bye.
Control: tag -1 squeeze-ignore wheezy-ignore Control: user release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Control: usertag -1 wheezy-can-defer This is not a blocker for the wheezy release. Tagging as such. Cheers, Julien
Hello, Good morning, We have gone through your samples from a partner and Here is our Order List. Please do bear in mind that we are very much in need of this order, quote your competitive prices. Kindly send the Order confirmation. Your early reply will be much appreciated. Best Regards, Maryanah Erwin. PT FINDORA INTERNUSA Jln Pahlawan 66 Kec. Arjawinangun 45162 CIREBON West-Java INDONESIA tel : +62 231 357334 fax: +62 231 357260 email: marketing@findora.com
Hello, Good morning, We have gone through your samples from a partner and Here is our Order List. Please do bear in mind that we are very much in need of this order, quote your competitive prices. Kindly send the Order confirmation. Your early reply will be much appreciated. Best Regards, Maryanah Erwin. PT FINDORA INTERNUSA Jln Pahlawan 66 Kec. Arjawinangun 45162 CIREBON West-Java INDONESIA tel : +62 231 357334 fax: +62 231 357260 email: marketing@findora.com
Hello, is there any progress on this long-standing [bug] report? [bug]: <https://bugs.debian.org/614497> Bug [#238245] was closed a long time ago, with the Debian website [license page] stating that new material (added since 25 January 2012) is dual-licensed under the Expat license or the GNU GPL v2 or later. [#238245]: <https://bugs.debian.org/238245> [license page]: <https://www.debian.org/license> However, older material is still under the non-free OPL, until the corresponding copyright holders have been contacted and have agreed to the relicensing... Bug [#388141] is still open, is there any publicly visible status report about the tracking of copyright holders and their OKs to the relicensing? [#388141]: <https://bugs.debian.org/388141> Above all, what's the status, as far as the documents shipped in Debian package doc-debian are concerned? Please let me know, thanks for your time and dedication!
tags 614497 + trixie-ignore thanks Cc Francesco, since they've expressed interest. In this release cycle too I don't have the time to do any significant work on this long standing issue. Maybe the big Debian website overhaul which is being worked on now will help getting this going... Bye, Joost